"""
Test retain function and chunk storage.
"""
import pytest
import logging
from datetime import datetime, timezone, timedelta
from hindsight_api.engine.memory_engine import Budget
from hindsight_api import RequestContext

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retain_with_chunks(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that retain function:
    1. Stores facts with associated chunks
    2. Recall returns chunk_id for each fact
    """
    bank_id = f"test_chunks_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "test_doc_123"

    try:
        # Store content that will be chunked (long enough to create multiple facts)
        long_content = """
        Alice is a senior software engineer at TechCorp. She has been working there for 5 years.
        Alice specializes in distributed systems and has led the development of the company's
        microservices architecture. She is known for writing clean, well-documented code.

        Bob joined the team last month as a junior developer. He is learning React and Node.js.
        Bob is enthusiastic and asks great questions during code reviews. He recently completed
        his first feature, which was a user authentication flow.

        The team uses Kubernetes for container orchestration and deploys to AWS. They follow
        agile methodologies with two-week sprints. Code reviews are mandatory before merging.
        """

        # Retain with document_id to enable chunk storage
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content=long_content,
            context="team overview",
            event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        print(f"\n=== Retained {len(unit_ids)} facts ===")
        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have extracted and stored facts"

        # Test 1: Recall with chunks enabled
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about Alice",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],  # Search for world facts
            include_chunks=True,  # Enable chunks
            max_chunk_tokens=8192,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        print(f"\n=== Recall Results (with chunks) ===")
        print(f"Found {len(result.results)} results")

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should find facts about Alice"

        # Verify that chunks are returned
        assert result.chunks is not None, "Chunks should be included in the response"
        assert len(result.chunks) > 0, "Should have at least one chunk"

        print(f"Number of chunks returned: {len(result.chunks)}")

        # Verify chunk structure
        for chunk_id, chunk_info in result.chunks.items():
            print(f"\nChunk {chunk_id}:")
            print(f"  - chunk_index: {chunk_info.chunk_index}")
            print(f"  - chunk_text length: {len(chunk_info.chunk_text)} chars")
            print(f"  - truncated: {chunk_info.truncated}")
            print(f"  - text preview: {chunk_info.chunk_text[:100]}...")

            # Verify chunk structure
            assert isinstance(chunk_info.chunk_index, int), "Chunk index should be an integer"
            assert chunk_info.chunk_index >= 0, "Chunk index should be non-negative"
            assert len(chunk_info.chunk_text) > 0, "Chunk text should not be empty"
            assert isinstance(chunk_info.truncated, bool), "Truncated should be boolean"

        print("\n=== Test passed: Chunks are stored and retrieved correctly ===")

    finally:
        # Cleanup - delete the test bank
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)
        print(f"\n=== Cleaned up bank: {bank_id} ===")


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_chunks_and_entities_follow_fact_order(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that chunks and entities in recall results follow the same order as facts.
    This is critical because token limits may truncate later items.

    The most relevant fact's chunk/entity should always be first in the returned data.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_ordering_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store multiple distinct pieces of content as separate documents
        # This ensures different chunks that we can identify
        contents = [
            {
                "content": "Alice works at Google as a software engineer. She loves Python and has 10 years of experience.",
                "document_id": "doc_alice",
                "context": "Alice's profile"
            },
            {
                "content": "Bob works at Meta as a data scientist. He specializes in machine learning and has published papers.",
                "document_id": "doc_bob",
                "context": "Bob's profile"
            },
            {
                "content": "Charlie works at Amazon as a product manager. He leads a team of 15 people and ships features weekly.",
                "document_id": "doc_charlie",
                "context": "Charlie's profile"
            },
        ]

        # Store each content piece
        for item in contents:
            await memory.retain_async(
                bank_id=bank_id,
                content=item["content"],
                context=item["context"],
                event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
                document_id=item["document_id"],
                request_context=request_context,
            )

        print("\n=== Stored 3 separate documents ===")

        # Recall with a query that matches all three, but Alice most closely
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about Alice's work at Google",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            include_chunks=True,
            max_chunk_tokens=8192,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        print(f"\n=== Recall Results ===")
        print(f"Found {len(result.results)} facts")

        # Extract the order of entities mentioned in facts
        fact_chunk_ids = []
        fact_entities = []

        for i, fact in enumerate(result.results):
            print(f"\nFact {i}: {fact.text[:80]}...")
            print(f"  chunk_id: {fact.chunk_id}")

            # Track chunk_id order
            if fact.chunk_id:
                fact_chunk_ids.append(fact.chunk_id)

            # Track entities mentioned in this fact
            if fact.entities:
                for entity in fact.entities:
                    if entity not in fact_entities:
                        fact_entities.append(entity)

        print(f"\n=== Fact chunk_ids in order: {fact_chunk_ids} ===")
        print(f"=== Fact entities in order: {fact_entities} ===")

        # Test 1: Verify chunks follow fact order
        if result.chunks:
            chunks_order = list(result.chunks.keys())
            print(f"\n=== Chunks dict order: {chunks_order} ===")

            # The chunks dict should contain chunks in the order they appear in facts
            # (may be fewer chunks than facts due to deduplication)
            chunk_positions = []
            for chunk_id in chunks_order:
                if chunk_id in fact_chunk_ids:
                    chunk_positions.append(fact_chunk_ids.index(chunk_id))

            print(f"=== Chunk positions in fact order: {chunk_positions} ===")

            # Verify chunks are in increasing order (following fact order)
            assert chunk_positions == sorted(chunk_positions), \
                f"Chunks should follow fact order! Got positions {chunk_positions} but expected {sorted(chunk_positions)}"

            print("✓ Chunks follow fact order correctly")

        # Test 2: Verify entities follow fact order
        if result.entities:
            entities_order = list(result.entities.keys())
            print(f"\n=== Entities dict order: {entities_order} ===")

            # The entities dict should contain entities in the order they first appear in facts
            entity_positions = []
            for entity_name in entities_order:
                if entity_name in fact_entities:
                    entity_positions.append(fact_entities.index(entity_name))

            print(f"=== Entity positions in fact order: {entity_positions} ===")

            # Verify entities are in increasing order (following fact order)
            assert entity_positions == sorted(entity_positions), \
                f"Entities should follow fact order! Got positions {entity_positions} but expected {sorted(entity_positions)}"

            print("✓ Entities follow fact order correctly")

        print("\n=== Test passed: Chunks and entities follow fact relevance order ===")

    finally:
        # Cleanup
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)
        print(f"\n=== Cleaned up bank: {bank_id} ===")


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_event_date_storage(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that event_date is correctly stored as occurred_start.
    Verifies that we can track when events actually happened vs when they were stored.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_temporal_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Event that occurred in the past
        past_event_date = datetime(2023, 6, 15, 14, 30, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        # Store a fact about a past event
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice completed the Q2 product launch on June 15th, 2023.",
            context="project history",
            event_date=past_event_date,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have created at least one memory unit"

        # Recall the fact
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="When did Alice complete the product launch?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the stored fact"

        # Verify the occurred_start matches our event_date
        fact = result.results[0]
        assert fact.occurred_start is not None, "occurred_start should be set"

        # Parse the occurred_start (it comes back as ISO string)
        if isinstance(fact.occurred_start, str):
            occurred_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.occurred_start.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
        else:
            occurred_dt = fact.occurred_start

        # Verify it matches our past event date (allowing for small time differences in extraction)
        assert occurred_dt.year == past_event_date.year, f"Year should match: {occurred_dt.year} vs {past_event_date.year}"
        assert occurred_dt.month == past_event_date.month, f"Month should match: {occurred_dt.month} vs {past_event_date.month}"

        print(f"\n✓ Event date correctly stored: {occurred_dt}")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="LLM date extraction from content is non-deterministic", strict=False)
async def test_temporal_ordering(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that facts can be stored and retrieved with correct temporal ordering.
    Stores facts with different event_dates and verifies temporal relationships.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_temporal_order_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store events in non-chronological order with different dates
        events = [
            {
                "content": "Alice joined the team in January 2023.",
                "event_date": datetime(2023, 1, 10, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
                "context": "team history"
            },
            {
                "content": "Alice got promoted to senior engineer in June 2023.",
                "event_date": datetime(2023, 6, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
                "context": "team history"
            },
            {
                "content": "Alice started as an intern in July 2022.",
                "event_date": datetime(2022, 7, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
                "context": "team history"
            },
        ]

        # Store all events
        for event in events:
            await memory.retain_async(
                bank_id=bank_id,
                content=event["content"],
                context=event["context"],
                event_date=event["event_date"],
                request_context=request_context,
            )

        print("\n=== Stored 3 events with different temporal dates ===")

        # Recall facts about Alice
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about Alice's career progression",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) >= 2, f"Should recall at least 2 events, got {len(result.results)}"

        # Collect occurred dates
        occurred_dates = []
        for fact in result.results:
            if fact.occurred_start:
                if isinstance(fact.occurred_start, str):
                    dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.occurred_start.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
                else:
                    dt = fact.occurred_start
                occurred_dates.append((dt, fact.text[:50]))
                print(f"  - {dt.date()}: {fact.text[:60]}...")

        # Verify we have temporal data for most facts (LLM may occasionally miss one)
        assert len(occurred_dates) >= 2, "At least 2 facts should have temporal data"

        # The dates should span the expected range (2022-2023)
        min_date = min(dt for dt, _ in occurred_dates)
        max_date = max(dt for dt, _ in occurred_dates)

        assert min_date.year == 2022, f"Earliest event should be in 2022, got {min_date.year}"
        assert max_date.year == 2023, f"Latest event should be in 2023, got {max_date.year}"

        print(f"\n✓ Temporal ordering preserved: {min_date.date()} to {max_date.date()}")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_mentioned_at_vs_occurred(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test distinction between when fact occurred vs when it was mentioned.

    Scenario: Ingesting a historical conversation from 2020
    - event_date: When the conversation happened (2020-03-15)
    - mentioned_at: When the conversation happened (same as event_date = 2020-03-15)
    - occurred_start/end: When the event in the conversation happened (extracted by LLM, or falls back to mentioned_at)
    """
    bank_id = f"test_mentioned_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Ingesting a conversation that happened in the past
        conversation_date = datetime(2020, 3, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        # Store a fact from a historical conversation
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice graduated from MIT in March 2020.",
            context="education history",
            event_date=conversation_date,  # When this conversation happened
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create memory unit"

        # Recall and check temporal fields
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Where did Alice go to school?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the fact"
        fact = result.results[0]

        # Parse occurred_start
        if fact.occurred_start:
            if isinstance(fact.occurred_start, str):
                occurred_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.occurred_start.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
            else:
                occurred_dt = fact.occurred_start

            # Should be close to the conversation date (falls back to mentioned_at if LLM doesn't extract)
            assert occurred_dt.year == 2020, f"occurred_start should be 2020, got {occurred_dt.year}"
            print(f"✓ occurred_start (when event happened): {occurred_dt}")

        # Parse mentioned_at
        if fact.mentioned_at:
            if isinstance(fact.mentioned_at, str):
                mentioned_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.mentioned_at.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
            else:
                mentioned_dt = fact.mentioned_at

            # mentioned_at should match the conversation date (event_date)
            time_diff = abs((conversation_date - mentioned_dt).total_seconds())
            assert time_diff < 60, f"mentioned_at should match event_date (2020-03-15), but diff is {time_diff}s"
            print(f"✓ mentioned_at (when conversation happened): {mentioned_dt}")

            # Verify it's the historical date, not today
            assert mentioned_dt.year == 2020, f"mentioned_at should be 2020, got {mentioned_dt.year}"

        print(f"✓ Test passed: Historical conversation correctly ingested with event_date=2020")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_occurred_dates_not_defaulted(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that occurred_start and occurred_end are NOT defaulted to mentioned_at.

    This is a regression test for a bug where occurred dates were incorrectly
    defaulting to mentioned_at when the LLM didn't provide them.

    Scenario: Store a fact where occurred dates are not applicable (current observation)
    - mentioned_at should be set (to event_date or now())
    - occurred_start and occurred_end should be None (not defaulted to mentioned_at)
    """
    bank_id = f"test_occurred_not_defaulted_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store a current observation where occurred dates don't make sense
        # Use present tense to avoid LLM extracting past dates
        # Content needs to be substantial enough to not be filtered as trivial
        event_date = datetime(2024, 2, 10, 15, 30, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice is a software engineer who specializes in Python and machine learning. She prefers dark roast coffee and works remotely from Seattle.",
            context="current observations about Alice",
            event_date=event_date,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create memory unit"

        # Recall and check that occurred dates are None
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about Alice",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world", "experience"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the fact"
        fact = result.results[0]

        # mentioned_at should be set
        assert fact.mentioned_at is not None, "mentioned_at should be set"

        # Parse mentioned_at
        if isinstance(fact.mentioned_at, str):
            mentioned_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.mentioned_at.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
        else:
            mentioned_dt = fact.mentioned_at

        # Verify it matches event_date
        time_diff = abs((event_date - mentioned_dt).total_seconds())
        assert time_diff < 60, f"mentioned_at should match event_date, but diff is {time_diff}s"

        # CRITICAL: occurred_start and occurred_end should be None
        # They should NOT default to mentioned_at
        if fact.occurred_start is not None:
            # If occurred_start is set, it means the LLM extracted it
            # In this case, log it but don't fail (LLM behavior can vary)
            print(f"⚠ LLM extracted occurred_start: {fact.occurred_start}")
            print(f"  This test expects None for present-tense observations")
        else:
            print(f"✓ occurred_start is correctly None (not defaulted to mentioned_at)")

        if fact.occurred_end is not None:
            print(f"⚠ LLM extracted occurred_end: {fact.occurred_end}")
            print(f"  This test expects None for present-tense observations")
        else:
            print(f"✓ occurred_end is correctly None (not defaulted to mentioned_at)")

        # At least verify they're not equal to mentioned_at if they are set
        if fact.occurred_start is not None:
            if isinstance(fact.occurred_start, str):
                occurred_start_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.occurred_start.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
            else:
                occurred_start_dt = fact.occurred_start

            # If they're equal, it suggests the old defaulting bug
            if occurred_start_dt == mentioned_dt:
                raise AssertionError(
                    f"occurred_start should NOT be defaulted to mentioned_at! "
                    f"occurred_start={occurred_start_dt}, mentioned_at={mentioned_dt}"
                )

        print(f"✓ Test passed: occurred dates are not incorrectly defaulted to mentioned_at")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_mentioned_at_from_context_string(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that mentioned_at is extracted from context string by LLM.

    Scenario: User provides date in context like "happened on 2023-05-10 14:30:00 UTC"
    - LLM should extract mentioned_at from this context
    - If LLM fails to extract, should fall back to event_date (which defaults to now())
    - mentioned_at should NEVER be None
    """
    bank_id = f"test_context_date_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Test case 1: Date in context string (like longmemeval benchmark)
        session_date = datetime(2023, 5, 10, 14, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice mentioned she loves hiking in the mountains.",
            context=f"Session ABC123 - you are the assistant in this conversation - happened on {session_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')} UTC.",
            event_date=None,  # Not providing event_date - should default to now() if LLM doesn't extract
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create memory unit"

        # Recall and verify mentioned_at is set
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="What does Alice like?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the fact"
        fact = result.results[0]

        # mentioned_at must ALWAYS be set
        assert fact.mentioned_at is not None, "mentioned_at should NEVER be None"

        # Parse mentioned_at
        if isinstance(fact.mentioned_at, str):
            mentioned_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.mentioned_at.replace('Z', '+00:00'))
        else:
            mentioned_dt = fact.mentioned_at

        # Check if LLM extracted the date from context (ideal case)
        # Or if it fell back to now() (acceptable fallback)
        time_diff_from_context = abs((session_date - mentioned_dt).total_seconds())
        time_diff_from_now = abs((datetime.now(timezone.utc) - mentioned_dt).total_seconds())

        # Should either match the context date OR be recent (now)
        is_from_context = time_diff_from_context < 60
        is_from_now = time_diff_from_now < 60

        assert is_from_context or is_from_now, \
            f"mentioned_at should be either from context ({session_date}) or now(), but got {mentioned_dt}"

        if is_from_context:
            print(f"✓ LLM successfully extracted mentioned_at from context: {mentioned_dt}")
            assert mentioned_dt.year == 2023
        else:
            print(f"⚠ LLM did not extract date from context, fell back to now(): {mentioned_dt}")

        print(f"✓ mentioned_at is always set (never None)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# No Timestamp Tests
# ============================================================


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retain_no_timestamp(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test retaining content with explicit "no timestamp" sentinel.

    When event_date=None is passed explicitly in the dict (i.e. caller opted into
    no timestamp), mentioned_at should be NULL in the DB rather than defaulting to now().
    """
    bank_id = f"test_no_timestamp_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Use retain_batch_async with explicit event_date=None key to signal "no timestamp"
        unit_ids_list = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {
                    "content": "The capital of France is Paris. The Eiffel Tower is located in Paris.",
                    "context": "general knowledge",
                    "event_date": None,  # Explicit sentinel: no timestamp
                }
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids_list) > 0, "Should create at least one batch result"
        unit_ids = unit_ids_list[0]
        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have extracted and stored facts"

        # Recall the facts
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Where is the Eiffel Tower?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the stored fact"

        # All temporal fields should be None for temporally agnostic content
        for fact in result.results:
            assert fact.mentioned_at is None, (
                f"mentioned_at should be None for no-timestamp content, got {fact.mentioned_at}"
            )

        print(f"\n✓ Test passed: mentioned_at is None for {len(result.results)} fact(s)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retain_omit_timestamp_defaults_to_now(memory, request_context):
    """
    Backward-compatibility regression test: omitting event_date still stores a real datetime.

    When event_date is absent from the content dict (key not present), the orchestrator
    should default to utcnow() — preserving existing behavior.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_default_timestamp_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    before = datetime.now(timezone.utc)

    try:
        # Omit event_date entirely — should default to now()
        unit_ids_list = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {
                    "content": "Alice is a software engineer who loves Python.",
                    "context": "profile",
                    # event_date intentionally omitted
                }
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        after = datetime.now(timezone.utc)

        assert len(unit_ids_list) > 0
        unit_ids = unit_ids_list[0]
        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have extracted and stored facts"

        # Recall and verify mentioned_at is a real datetime close to now
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Who is Alice?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the fact"
        fact = result.results[0]

        assert fact.mentioned_at is not None, "mentioned_at should be set when event_date is omitted"

        if isinstance(fact.mentioned_at, str):
            mentioned_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(fact.mentioned_at.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
        else:
            mentioned_dt = fact.mentioned_at

        # Should be within 60s of when we ran the test
        assert before <= mentioned_dt <= after + timedelta(seconds=60), (
            f"mentioned_at {mentioned_dt} should be close to now ({before} – {after})"
        )

        print(f"\n✓ Test passed: mentioned_at={mentioned_dt} is a real datetime (backward compat)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Context Tracking Tests
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_context_preservation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that context is preserved and retrievable.
    Context helps understand why/how memory was formed.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_context_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content with specific context
        specific_context = "team meeting notes from Q4 planning session"

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="The team decided to prioritize mobile development for next quarter.",
            context=specific_context,
            event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create at least one memory unit"

        # Recall and verify context is returned
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="What did the team decide?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall the stored fact"

        # Verify context is preserved (context is stored in the database)
        # Note: context might not be returned in the API response by default
        # but it should be stored in the database
        print(f"✓ Successfully stored fact with context: '{specific_context}'")
        print(f"  Retrieved {len(result.results)} facts")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_context_with_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that each item in a batch can have different contexts.

    Note: LLM fact extraction is non-deterministic. Simple sentences may
    not always produce exactly 1 fact each. We verify the batch was
    processed and at least some facts were extracted.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_batch_context_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store batch with different contexts
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {
                    "content": "Alice completed the authentication module.",
                    "context": "sprint 1 standup",
                    "event_date": datetime(2024, 1, 10, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
                },
                {
                    "content": "Bob started working on the database schema.",
                    "context": "sprint 1 planning",
                    "event_date": datetime(2024, 1, 11, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
                },
                {
                    "content": "Charlie fixed critical bugs in the payment flow.",
                    "context": "incident response",
                    "event_date": datetime(2024, 1, 12, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
                }
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Should have created facts from at least some items
        # LLM extraction is non-deterministic, so we allow some flexibility
        total_units = sum(len(ids) for ids in unit_ids)
        assert total_units >= 2, f"Should create at least 2 units from 3 batch items, got {total_units}"

        print(f"✓ Stored {len(unit_ids)} batch items with different contexts")
        print(f"  Created {total_units} total memory units")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Metadata Storage Tests
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_metadata_storage_and_retrieval(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that user-defined metadata is preserved.
    Metadata allows arbitrary key-value data to be stored with facts.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_metadata_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content with custom metadata
        custom_metadata = {
            "source": "slack",
            "channel": "engineering",
            "importance": "high",
            "tags": "product,launch"
        }

        # Note: retain_async doesn't directly support metadata parameter
        # Metadata would need to be supported in the API layer
        # For now, we test that the system handles content without errors
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="The product launch is scheduled for March 1st.",
            context="planning meeting",
            event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create memory units"

        # Recall to verify storage worked
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="When is the product launch?",
            budget=Budget.LOW,
            max_tokens=500,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall stored facts"

        print(f"✓ Successfully stored and retrieved facts")
        print(f"  (Note: Metadata support depends on API implementation)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Batch Processing Edge Cases
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_empty_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that empty batch is handled gracefully without errors.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_empty_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Attempt to store empty batch
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Should return empty list or handle gracefully
        assert isinstance(unit_ids, list), "Should return a list"
        assert len(unit_ids) == 0, "Empty batch should create no units"

        print("✓ Empty batch handled gracefully")

    finally:
        # Clean up (though nothing should be stored)
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_single_item_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that batch with one item works correctly.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_single_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store batch with single item
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {
                    "content": "Alice shipped the new feature to production.",
                    "context": "deployment log",
                    "event_date": datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
                }
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) == 1, "Should return one list of unit IDs"
        assert len(unit_ids[0]) > 0, "Should create at least one memory unit"

        print(f"✓ Single-item batch created {len(unit_ids[0])} units")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_mixed_content_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test batch with varying content sizes (short and long).
    """
    bank_id = f"test_mixed_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Mix short and long content
        short_content = "Alice joined the team."
        long_content = """
        Bob has been working on the authentication system for the past three months.
        He implemented OAuth 2.0 integration, set up JWT token management, and built
        a comprehensive role-based access control system. The system supports multiple
        identity providers including Google, GitHub, and Microsoft. Bob also wrote
        extensive documentation and unit tests covering over 90% of the codebase.
        The team recognized his work with an excellence award at the quarterly meeting.
        """

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {"content": short_content, "context": "onboarding"},
                {"content": long_content, "context": "performance review"},
                {"content": "Charlie is on vacation this week.", "context": "team status"}
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # All items should be processed
        assert len(unit_ids) == 3, "Should process all 3 items"

        # Long content should create more facts
        short_units = len(unit_ids[0])
        long_units = len(unit_ids[1])

        print(f"✓ Mixed batch processed successfully")
        print(f"  Short content: {short_units} units")
        print(f"  Long content: {long_units} units")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_batch_with_missing_optional_fields(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that batch handles items with missing optional fields.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_optional_fields_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Some items have all fields, some have minimal fields
        unit_ids = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=[
                {
                    "content": "Alice finished the project.",
                    "context": "complete record",
                    "event_date": datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
                },
                {
                    "content": "Bob started a new task.",
                    # No context or event_date
                },
                {
                    "content": "Charlie reviewed code.",
                    "context": "code review",
                    # No event_date
                }
            ],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # All items should be processed successfully
        assert len(unit_ids) == 3, "Should process all items even with missing optional fields"

        total_units = sum(len(ids) for ids in unit_ids)
        print(f"✓ Batch with mixed optional fields created {total_units} total units")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Multi-Document Batch Tests
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_single_batch_multiple_documents(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test storing multiple distinct documents in a single batch call.
    Each should be tracked separately.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_multi_docs_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store single batch where each item could be a different document
        # (In practice, document_id is a batch-level parameter, so we test
        # that multiple retain_async calls work correctly)

        doc1_units = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice's resume: 10 years Python experience, worked at Google.",
            context="resume review",
            document_id="resume_alice",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        doc2_units = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Bob's resume: 5 years JavaScript experience, worked at Meta.",
            context="resume review",
            document_id="resume_bob",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        doc3_units = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Charlie's resume: 8 years Go experience, worked at Amazon.",
            context="resume review",
            document_id="resume_charlie",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # All documents should be stored
        assert len(doc1_units) > 0, "Should create units for doc1"
        assert len(doc2_units) > 0, "Should create units for doc2"
        assert len(doc3_units) > 0, "Should create units for doc3"

        total_units = len(doc1_units) + len(doc2_units) + len(doc3_units)
        print(f"✓ Stored 3 separate documents with {total_units} total units")

        # Verify we can recall from any document
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Who worked at Google?",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should find facts about Alice"

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_document_upsert_behavior(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that upserting a document replaces the old content.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_upsert_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "project_status"

    try:
        # Store initial version
        v1_units = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Project is in planning phase. Alice is the lead.",
            context="status update v1",
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(v1_units) > 0, "Should create units for v1"

        # Update with new version (upsert)
        v2_units = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Project is in development phase. Bob has joined as co-lead.",
            context="status update v2",
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(v2_units) > 0, "Should create units for v2"

        # Recall should return the updated information
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="What is the project status?",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall facts"

        print(f"✓ Document upsert created v1: {len(v1_units)} units, v2: {len(v2_units)} units")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Chunk Storage Advanced Tests
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_chunk_fact_mapping(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that facts correctly reference their source chunks via chunk_id.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_chunk_mapping_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "technical_doc"

    try:
        # Store content that will be chunked
        content = """
        The authentication system uses JWT tokens for session management.
        Tokens expire after 24 hours and must be refreshed using the refresh endpoint.
        The system supports OAuth 2.0 integration with Google and GitHub.

        The database layer uses PostgreSQL with connection pooling.
        We maintain separate read and write connection pools for performance.
        All queries use prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.
        """

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content=content,
            context="technical documentation",
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create memory units"

        # Recall with chunks enabled
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="How does authentication work?",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            include_chunks=True,
            max_chunk_tokens=8192,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result.results) > 0, "Should recall facts"

        # Verify facts have chunk_id references
        facts_with_chunks = [f for f in result.results if f.chunk_id]

        print(f"✓ Created {len(unit_ids)} units from chunked document")
        print(f"  {len(facts_with_chunks)}/{len(result.results)} facts have chunk_id references")

        # If chunks are returned, verify they match the chunk_ids in facts
        if result.chunks:
            fact_chunk_ids = {f.chunk_id for f in facts_with_chunks}
            returned_chunk_ids = set(result.chunks.keys())

            # All chunk_ids in facts should have corresponding chunk data
            assert fact_chunk_ids.issubset(returned_chunk_ids) or len(fact_chunk_ids) == 0, \
                "Fact chunk_ids should have corresponding chunk data"

            print(f"  Returned {len(result.chunks)} chunks matching fact references")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_chunk_ordering_preservation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that chunk_index reflects the correct order within a document.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_chunk_order_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "ordered_doc"

    try:
        # Store long content that will create multiple chunks with meaningful content
        sections = []
        sections.append("""
        Alice is the team lead for the authentication project. She has 10 years of experience
        with security systems and previously worked at Google on identity management.
        She is responsible for architecture decisions and code review.
        """)
        sections.append("""
        Bob is a backend engineer focusing on the API layer. He specializes in Python
        and has built several microservices for the company. He joined the team in 2023.
        """)
        sections.append("""
        Charlie is the DevOps engineer managing the deployment pipeline. He set up
        our Kubernetes infrastructure and maintains the CI/CD system using GitHub Actions.
        """)
        sections.append("""
        The project uses PostgreSQL as the main database with Redis for caching.
        We deploy to AWS using Docker containers orchestrated by Kubernetes.
        The team follows agile methodology with two-week sprints.
        """)
        sections.append("""
        Security is a top priority. All API endpoints require JWT authentication.
        We use OAuth 2.0 for third-party integrations and maintain strict access controls.
        Regular security audits are conducted quarterly.
        """)

        content = "\n\n".join(sections)

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content=content,
            context="multi-section document",
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create units"

        # Recall with chunks
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about the sections",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=2000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            include_chunks=True,
            max_chunk_tokens=8192,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        if result.chunks:
            # Verify chunk_index values are sequential and start from 0
            chunk_indices = [chunk.chunk_index for chunk in result.chunks.values()]
            chunk_indices_sorted = sorted(chunk_indices)

            print(f"✓ Document created {len(result.chunks)} chunks")
            print(f"  Chunk indices: {chunk_indices}")

            # Indices should start from 0 and be sequential
            if len(chunk_indices) > 0:
                assert min(chunk_indices) == 0, "Chunk indices should start from 0"
                assert chunk_indices_sorted == list(range(len(chunk_indices))), \
                    "Chunk indices should be sequential"
        else:
            print("✓ Content stored (may have created single chunk or no chunks returned)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
@pytest.mark.timeout(180)  # Allow up to 3 minutes for this test
async def test_chunks_truncation_behavior(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that when chunks exceed max_chunk_tokens, truncation is indicated.

    Note: This test processes larger content and may take longer than typical tests.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_chunk_truncation_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "large_doc"

    try:
        # Create a moderately large document with meaningful content
        # Reduced from * 5 to * 2 for faster execution while still testing truncation
        large_content = """
        The company's product roadmap for 2024 includes several major initiatives.
        The engineering team is expanding to support these efforts.

        Alice leads the authentication team, which is implementing OAuth 2.0 and JWT tokens.
        The team has been working on this for six months and expects to launch in Q2.
        Security is the top priority, with regular penetration testing scheduled.

        Bob manages the API development team. They are building RESTful endpoints
        for all major features including user management, billing, and analytics.
        The team uses Python with FastAPI and deploys to AWS Lambda.

        Charlie oversees the infrastructure team. They maintain Kubernetes clusters
        across three AWS regions for high availability. The team also manages
        the CI/CD pipeline using GitHub Actions and ArgoCD.

        The data engineering team, led by Diana, processes millions of events daily.
        They use Apache Kafka for streaming and Snowflake for analytics.
        Real-time dashboards are built with Grafana and Prometheus.

        The mobile team is building iOS and Android apps using React Native.
        They are targeting a beta launch in Q3 with select customers.
        Push notifications and offline support are key features.

        The design team has created a new design system that will be rolled out
        across all products. The system includes components for accessibility
        and internationalization support for 12 languages.

        Customer support is being enhanced with AI-powered chatbots.
        The system can handle common queries and escalate complex issues to humans.
        Average response time has improved by 40% since implementation.

        The marketing team is planning a major campaign for the product launch.
        They are working with influencers and planning webinars for enterprise customers.
        Early feedback from beta users has been very positive.

        Sales operations are being streamlined with new CRM integrations.
        The team can now track leads more effectively and automate follow-ups.
        Conversion rates have increased by 25% in the pilot program.

        The finance team is implementing new budgeting tools for better forecasting.
        They are also working on automated expense reporting and approval workflows.
        This will save approximately 100 hours per month in manual work.
        """ * 2  # Repeat to create enough content for truncation testing

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content=large_content,
            context="large document test",
            document_id=document_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should create units"

        # Recall with very small chunk token limit to force truncation
        result = await memory.recall_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            query="Tell me about the document",
            budget=Budget.MID,
            max_tokens=1000,
            fact_type=["world"],
            include_chunks=True,
            max_chunk_tokens=500,  # Small limit to test truncation
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        if result.chunks:
            # Check if any chunks show truncation
            truncated_chunks = [
                chunk_id for chunk_id, chunk_info in result.chunks.items()
                if chunk_info.truncated
            ]

            print(f"✓ Retrieved {len(result.chunks)} chunks")
            if truncated_chunks:
                print(f"  {len(truncated_chunks)} chunks were truncated due to token limit")
            else:
                print(f"  No chunks were truncated (content within limit)")

        else:
            print("✓ No chunks returned (may be under token limit)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


# ============================================================
# Memory Links Tests
# ============================================================

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_links_creation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that temporal links are created between facts with nearby event dates.

    Temporal links connect facts that occurred close in time (within 24 hours).
    """
    bank_id = f"test_temporal_links_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store facts with nearby timestamps (within 24 hours)
        base_date = datetime(2024, 1, 15, 10, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        # Fact 1 at 10:00 AM
        unit_ids_1 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice started working on the authentication module.",
            context="daily standup",
            event_date=base_date,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Fact 2 at 2:00 PM same day (4 hours later)
        unit_ids_2 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Bob reviewed the API design document.",
            context="daily standup",
            event_date=base_date.replace(hour=14),
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Fact 3 at 9:00 AM next day (23 hours later)
        unit_ids_3 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Charlie deployed the new database schema.",
            context="daily standup",
            event_date=base_date.replace(day=16, hour=9),
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids_1) > 0 and len(unit_ids_2) > 0 and len(unit_ids_3) > 0

        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids_1) + len(unit_ids_2) + len(unit_ids_3)} facts")

        # Query the memory_links table to verify temporal links exist
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            # Get all temporal links for these units
            all_unit_ids = unit_ids_1 + unit_ids_2 + unit_ids_3

            temporal_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, link_type, weight
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type = 'temporal'
                ORDER BY weight DESC
                """,
                all_unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(temporal_links)} temporal links")

            # Should have temporal links between the facts
            assert len(temporal_links) > 0, "Should have created temporal links between facts with nearby dates"

            # Verify link properties
            for link in temporal_links:
                from_id = str(link['from_unit_id'])
                to_id = str(link['to_unit_id'])
                logger.info(f"  Link: {from_id[:8]}... -> {to_id[:8]}... (weight: {link['weight']:.2f})")
                assert link['link_type'] == 'temporal', "Link type should be 'temporal'"
                assert 0.0 <= link['weight'] <= 1.0, "Weight should be between 0 and 1"

            logger.info("Temporal links created successfully with proper weights")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_semantic_links_creation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that semantic links are created between facts with similar content.

    Semantic links connect facts that are semantically similar based on embeddings.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_semantic_links_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store facts with similar semantic content
        unit_ids_1 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice is an expert in Python programming and has built many web applications.",
            context="team skills",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Similar content - should create semantic link
        unit_ids_2 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Bob is proficient in Python development and specializes in building APIs.",
            context="team skills",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Different content - less likely to create strong semantic link
        unit_ids_3 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="The quarterly sales meeting is scheduled for next Tuesday at 3 PM.",
            context="calendar events",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids_1) > 0 and len(unit_ids_2) > 0 and len(unit_ids_3) > 0

        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids_1) + len(unit_ids_2) + len(unit_ids_3)} facts")

        # Query the memory_links table to verify semantic links exist
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            all_unit_ids = unit_ids_1 + unit_ids_2 + unit_ids_3

            semantic_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, link_type, weight
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type = 'semantic'
                ORDER BY weight DESC
                """,
                all_unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(semantic_links)} semantic links")

            # Should have semantic links between similar facts
            assert len(semantic_links) > 0, "Should have created semantic links between similar facts"

            # Verify link properties
            for link in semantic_links:
                from_id = str(link['from_unit_id'])
                to_id = str(link['to_unit_id'])
                logger.info(f"  Link: {from_id[:8]}... -> {to_id[:8]}... (weight: {link['weight']:.3f})")
                assert link['link_type'] == 'semantic', "Link type should be 'semantic'"
                assert 0.0 <= link['weight'] <= 1.0, "Weight should be between 0 and 1"
                # Semantic links typically have weight >= 0.7 (threshold)
                assert link['weight'] >= 0.7, f"Semantic links should have weight >= 0.7, got {link['weight']}"

            logger.info("Semantic links created successfully between similar content")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_entity_links_creation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that entity links are created between facts that mention the same entities.

    Entity links connect facts that reference the same person, place, or concept.
    This is core functionality and should work consistently.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_entity_links_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store facts that mention the same entities
        unit_ids_1 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice joined Google as a software engineer in 2020.",
            context="career history",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Mentions same entity (Alice) - should create entity link
        unit_ids_2 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice led the development of the new authentication system.",
            context="project updates",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Mentions same entity (Google) - should create entity link
        unit_ids_3 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Google announced new cloud services at their annual conference.",
            context="tech news",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Different entities - no entity link expected
        unit_ids_4 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Bob works at Meta on machine learning infrastructure.",
            context="career history",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids_1) > 0 and len(unit_ids_2) > 0 and len(unit_ids_3) > 0 and len(unit_ids_4) > 0

        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids_1) + len(unit_ids_2) + len(unit_ids_3) + len(unit_ids_4)} facts")

        # Query the memory_links table to verify entity links exist
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            all_unit_ids = unit_ids_1 + unit_ids_2 + unit_ids_3 + unit_ids_4

            entity_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, link_type, weight, entity_id
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type = 'entity'
                ORDER BY from_unit_id, to_unit_id
                """,
                all_unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(entity_links)} entity links")

            # Entity extraction is core functionality and should work
            assert len(entity_links) > 0, "Should have created entity links between facts with shared entities (Alice, Google)"

            # Verify link properties
            entities_seen = set()
            for link in entity_links:
                entity_id = link['entity_id']
                entities_seen.add(str(entity_id))
                from_id = str(link['from_unit_id'])
                to_id = str(link['to_unit_id'])
                logger.info(f"  Link: {from_id[:8]}... -> {to_id[:8]}... via entity {str(entity_id)[:8]}...")
                assert link['link_type'] == 'entity', "Link type should be 'entity'"
                assert link['weight'] == 1.0, "Entity links should have weight 1.0"
                assert entity_id is not None, "Entity links must reference an entity_id"

            logger.info(f"Entity links created successfully for {len(entities_seen)} unique entities")

            # Verify bidirectional links (entity links should be bidirectional)
            link_pairs = set()
            for link in entity_links:
                from_id = str(link['from_unit_id'])
                to_id = str(link['to_unit_id'])
                entity_id = str(link['entity_id'])
                link_pairs.add((from_id, to_id, entity_id))

            # Check that for each (A -> B) link, there's a (B -> A) link with same entity
            for from_id, to_id, entity_id in link_pairs:
                reverse_exists = (to_id, from_id, entity_id) in link_pairs
                assert reverse_exists, f"Entity links should be bidirectional: missing reverse link for {from_id[:8]} -> {to_id[:8]}"

            logger.info("Entity links are properly bidirectional")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_people_name_extraction(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that people names are correctly extracted as entities.

    This verifies that the entity resolver properly identifies and extracts
    person names from content.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_people_names_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content with various people names
        contents = [
            "John Smith is a software engineer at Google.",
            "Dr. Sarah Johnson presented her research at the conference.",
            "Bob Williams and Alice Chen collaborated on the project.",
            "Professor Michael Brown teaches computer science at MIT.",
        ]

        for content in contents:
            await memory.retain_async(
                bank_id=bank_id,
                content=content,
                context="people info",
                request_context=request_context,
            )

        # Query entities to verify people names were extracted
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            entities = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT canonical_name, mention_count
                FROM entities
                WHERE bank_id = $1
                ORDER BY mention_count DESC, canonical_name
                """,
                bank_id
            )

        logger.info(f"Extracted {len(entities)} entities")
        for entity in entities:
            logger.info(f"  - {entity['canonical_name']} (mentions: {entity['mention_count']})")

        # Verify we extracted the expected people names
        entity_names = {e['canonical_name'].lower() for e in entities}

        # Check for expected people (names may vary slightly based on LLM extraction)
        expected_people = ["john", "sarah", "bob", "alice", "michael"]
        found_people = []
        for person in expected_people:
            matching = [name for name in entity_names if person in name]
            if matching:
                found_people.append(person)
                logger.info(f"  Found '{person}' as: {matching}")

        assert len(found_people) >= 3, \
            f"Should extract at least 3 people names, found: {found_people}. All entities: {entity_names}"

        logger.info(f"Successfully extracted {len(found_people)} people names: {found_people}")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_mention_count_accuracy(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that mention_count is accurately tracked across retain calls.

    Verifies that when an entity is mentioned multiple times across different
    retain calls, the mention_count reflects the total number of mentions.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_mention_count_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content mentioning "Alice" multiple times across separate retain calls
        contents = [
            "Alice is a data scientist at Netflix.",
            "Alice presented her research on recommendation algorithms.",
            "Alice leads a team of 5 engineers.",
            "Alice graduated from Stanford with honors.",
            "Alice published a paper on machine learning.",
        ]

        for content in contents:
            await memory.retain_async(
                bank_id=bank_id,
                content=content,
                context="career info",
                request_context=request_context,
            )

        # Check Alice's mention count
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            alice_entity = await conn.fetchrow(
                """
                SELECT canonical_name, mention_count
                FROM entities
                WHERE bank_id = $1 AND LOWER(canonical_name) LIKE '%alice%'
                """,
                bank_id
            )

        assert alice_entity is not None, "Alice entity should exist"
        logger.info(f"Alice mention_count after 5 separate retains: {alice_entity['mention_count']}")

        # Alice should have mention_count >= 5 (one per content item)
        assert alice_entity['mention_count'] >= 5, \
            f"Alice should have at least 5 mentions, got {alice_entity['mention_count']}"

        logger.info(f"Mention count accuracy verified: {alice_entity['mention_count']} mentions")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_mention_count_batch_retain(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that mention_count is accurate when using batch retain with multiple items.

    This specifically tests the scenario where multiple content items are retained
    in a single batch call, ensuring mention_count is correctly aggregated.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_mention_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Batch retain with multiple items mentioning "Bob"
        batch_contents = [
            {"content": "Bob is a frontend developer at Microsoft.", "context": "work"},
            {"content": "Bob specializes in React and TypeScript.", "context": "skills"},
            {"content": "Bob has 10 years of experience.", "context": "experience"},
            {"content": "Bob mentors junior developers.", "context": "mentoring"},
            {"content": "Bob presented at ReactConf 2024.", "context": "conferences"},
            {"content": "Bob wrote a popular open-source library.", "context": "projects"},
        ]

        # Use retain_batch_async for batch processing
        await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=batch_contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Check Bob's mention count after batch retain
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            bob_entity = await conn.fetchrow(
                """
                SELECT canonical_name, mention_count
                FROM entities
                WHERE bank_id = $1 AND LOWER(canonical_name) LIKE '%bob%'
                """,
                bank_id
            )

        assert bob_entity is not None, "Bob entity should exist after batch retain"
        logger.info(f"Bob mention_count after batch retain of 6 items: {bob_entity['mention_count']}")

        # Bob should have mention_count >= 6 (mentioned in each batch item)
        assert bob_entity['mention_count'] >= 6, \
            f"Bob should have at least 6 mentions from batch retain, got {bob_entity['mention_count']}"

        # Now do another batch retain with more Bob mentions
        more_contents = [
            {"content": "Bob loves hiking on weekends.", "context": "hobbies"},
            {"content": "Bob has a dog named Max.", "context": "personal"},
        ]

        await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=more_contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Check updated mention count
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            bob_entity_updated = await conn.fetchrow(
                """
                SELECT canonical_name, mention_count
                FROM entities
                WHERE bank_id = $1 AND LOWER(canonical_name) LIKE '%bob%'
                """,
                bank_id
            )

        logger.info(f"Bob mention_count after second batch: {bob_entity_updated['mention_count']}")

        # Bob should now have mention_count >= 8 (6 + 2)
        assert bob_entity_updated['mention_count'] >= 8, \
            f"Bob should have at least 8 mentions after second batch, got {bob_entity_updated['mention_count']}"

        # Verify the increment is correct
        increment = bob_entity_updated['mention_count'] - bob_entity['mention_count']
        assert increment >= 2, \
            f"Mention count should have increased by at least 2, but increased by {increment}"

        logger.info(f"Batch retain mention count verified: {bob_entity['mention_count']} -> {bob_entity_updated['mention_count']}")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_causal_links_creation(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that causal links are created between facts with causal relationships.

    Causal links connect facts where one causes, enables, or prevents another.
    Note: This depends on LLM extracting causal relationships, which may be non-deterministic.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_causal_links_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content with explicit causal relationships
        # Using clear cause-and-effect language to maximize LLM detection
        content = """
        Alice completed the authentication module on Monday. Because Alice finished the auth module,
        Bob was able to start integrating it with the API on Tuesday. Bob's API integration enabled
        Charlie to begin testing the complete user flow on Wednesday. The successful testing caused
        the team to schedule the production deployment for Friday.
        """

        unit_ids = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content=content,
            context="project timeline",
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have created facts"
        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids)} facts from causal content")

        # Query the memory_links table to check for causal links
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            causal_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, link_type, weight
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type IN ('causes', 'caused_by', 'enables', 'prevents')
                ORDER BY link_type, weight DESC
                """,
                unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(causal_links)} causal links")

            if len(causal_links) > 0:
                # Verify link properties
                causal_types = {}
                for link in causal_links:
                    link_type = link['link_type']
                    causal_types[link_type] = causal_types.get(link_type, 0) + 1
                    from_id = str(link['from_unit_id'])
                    to_id = str(link['to_unit_id'])
                    logger.info(f"  Link: {from_id[:8]}... -> {to_id[:8]}... ({link_type}, weight: {link['weight']:.2f})")
                    assert link['link_type'] in ['causes', 'caused_by', 'enables', 'prevents'], \
                        f"Causal link type must be valid, got '{link['link_type']}'"
                    assert 0.0 <= link['weight'] <= 1.0, "Weight should be between 0 and 1"

                logger.info("Causal links created successfully:")
                for link_type, count in causal_types.items():
                    logger.info(f"  - {link_type}: {count} links")
            else:
                logger.warning("No causal links detected (LLM may not have extracted causal relationships)")
                logger.info("  This is expected as causal extraction depends on LLM interpretation")

        # This test passes even if no causal links are found, since causal extraction
        # is non-deterministic and depends on LLM behavior
        logger.info("Test completed (causal link extraction is LLM-dependent)")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_all_link_types_together(memory, request_context):
    """
    Integration test: Verify all link types can be created in a single retain operation.

    Tests that temporal, semantic, entity, and potentially causal links are all
    created when appropriate conditions are met.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_all_links_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store multiple related facts that should trigger all link types
        base_date = datetime(2024, 1, 15, 10, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        # Fact 1: Alice at time T
        unit_ids_1 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice completed the Python backend service for the authentication system.",
            context="sprint review",
            event_date=base_date,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Fact 2: Related to Alice, similar topic (Python), close in time
        unit_ids_2 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice optimized the Python code and improved the authentication performance by 40%.",
            context="sprint review",
            event_date=base_date.replace(hour=14),  # Same day, 4 hours later
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Fact 3: Related to Alice, different topic but same entity
        unit_ids_3 = await memory.retain_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            content="Alice presented the security architecture at the team meeting.",
            context="team meeting",
            event_date=base_date.replace(day=16),  # Next day
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(unit_ids_1) > 0 and len(unit_ids_2) > 0 and len(unit_ids_3) > 0

        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids_1) + len(unit_ids_2) + len(unit_ids_3)} facts")

        # Query for all link types
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            all_unit_ids = unit_ids_1 + unit_ids_2 + unit_ids_3

            all_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT link_type, COUNT(*) as count
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                GROUP BY link_type
                ORDER BY link_type
                """,
                all_unit_ids
            )

            logger.info("Link types created:")
            link_types_found = {}
            for row in all_links:
                link_type = row['link_type']
                count = row['count']
                link_types_found[link_type] = count
                logger.info(f"  - {link_type}: {count} links")

            # Should have temporal, semantic, and entity links
            assert 'temporal' in link_types_found, "Should have temporal links (facts with nearby dates)"
            assert 'semantic' in link_types_found, "Should have semantic links (similar content about Python/auth)"
            assert 'entity' in link_types_found, "Should have entity links (all mention Alice)"

            logger.info(f"Successfully created {len(link_types_found)} different link types")
            logger.info("All major link types (temporal, semantic, entity) are working correctly")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_semantic_links_within_same_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that semantic links are created between facts retained in the SAME batch.

    This is a regression test - semantic links should connect similar facts
    even when they are retained together in a single call.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_semantic_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Retain multiple semantically similar facts in ONE batch
        contents = [
            {"content": "Alice is an expert in Python programming and machine learning.", "context": "team skills"},
            {"content": "Bob specializes in Python development and data science.", "context": "team skills"},
            {"content": "Charlie works with Python for backend API development.", "context": "team skills"},
        ]

        result = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Flatten the list of lists
        unit_ids = [uid for sublist in result for uid in sublist]

        assert len(unit_ids) >= 3, f"Should have created at least 3 facts, got {len(unit_ids)}"
        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids)} facts in single batch")

        # Query semantic links between these units
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            semantic_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, weight
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND to_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type = 'semantic'
                """,
                unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(semantic_links)} semantic links within the batch")

            # All three facts mention Python - they should be linked to each other
            assert len(semantic_links) > 0, (
                "REGRESSION: Semantic links should be created between similar facts "
                "retained in the same batch, but none were found"
            )

            # Log the links for debugging
            for link in semantic_links:
                logger.info(f"  Semantic link: {str(link['from_unit_id'])[:8]}... -> {str(link['to_unit_id'])[:8]}... (weight: {link['weight']:.3f})")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_links_within_same_batch(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that temporal links are created between facts retained in the SAME batch.

    This is a regression test - temporal links should connect facts with nearby
    event dates even when they are retained together in a single call.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_temporal_batch_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Retain multiple facts with nearby timestamps in ONE batch
        base_date = datetime(2024, 6, 15, 10, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)

        contents = [
            {
                "content": "Morning standup: Alice presented the sprint goals.",
                "context": "daily meeting",
                "event_date": base_date
            },
            {
                "content": "Bob demoed the new feature after standup.",
                "context": "daily meeting",
                "event_date": base_date + timedelta(hours=1)  # 1 hour later
            },
            {
                "content": "Charlie reviewed the pull requests in the afternoon.",
                "context": "daily meeting",
                "event_date": base_date + timedelta(hours=4)  # 4 hours later
            },
        ]

        result = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Flatten the list of lists
        unit_ids = [uid for sublist in result for uid in sublist]

        assert len(unit_ids) >= 3, f"Should have created at least 3 facts, got {len(unit_ids)}"
        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids)} facts in single batch")

        # Query temporal links between these units
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            temporal_links = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT from_unit_id, to_unit_id, weight
                FROM memory_links
                WHERE from_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND to_unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                  AND link_type = 'temporal'
                """,
                unit_ids
            )

            logger.info(f"Found {len(temporal_links)} temporal links within the batch")

            # All three facts are within 24 hours - they should be linked to each other
            assert len(temporal_links) > 0, (
                "REGRESSION: Temporal links should be created between facts with nearby dates "
                "retained in the same batch, but none were found"
            )

            # Log the links for debugging
            for link in temporal_links:
                logger.info(f"  Temporal link: {str(link['from_unit_id'])[:8]}... -> {str(link['to_unit_id'])[:8]}... (weight: {link['weight']:.3f})")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_user_provided_entities(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that user-provided entities are merged with auto-extracted entities.

    This tests the feature added in PR #91 where users can provide entities
    via the 'entities' field in the retain request. These should be combined
    with LLM-extracted entities, with case-insensitive deduplication.
    """
    bank_id = f"test_user_entities_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"

    try:
        # Store content with user-provided entities
        # The content mentions "Alice" which LLM might extract,
        # but we also provide "ProjectX" and "ACME Corp" which may not be in the text
        contents = [
            {
                "content": "Alice completed the quarterly report.",
                "context": "work update",
                "entities": [
                    {"text": "ProjectX", "type": "PROJECT"},
                    {"text": "ACME Corp", "type": "ORG"},
                    {"text": "Alice"},  # May also be extracted by LLM (dedup test)
                ],
            }
        ]

        result = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        # Flatten the list of lists
        unit_ids = [uid for sublist in result for uid in sublist]
        assert len(unit_ids) > 0, "Should have created at least one fact"

        logger.info(f"Created {len(unit_ids)} facts with user-provided entities")

        # Query entity links to verify user-provided entities were stored
        async with memory._pool.acquire() as conn:
            # Get all entities linked to our facts via the unit_entities junction table
            entity_rows = await conn.fetch(
                """
                SELECT DISTINCT e.canonical_name
                FROM entities e
                JOIN unit_entities ue ON e.id = ue.entity_id
                WHERE ue.unit_id::text = ANY($1)
                """,
                unit_ids
            )

            entity_names = {row['canonical_name'].lower() for row in entity_rows}
            logger.info(f"Found entities linked to facts: {[row['canonical_name'] for row in entity_rows]}")

            # Verify user-provided entities are present
            assert "projectx" in entity_names, "User-provided entity 'ProjectX' should be linked"
            assert "acme corp" in entity_names, "User-provided entity 'ACME Corp' should be linked"

            # Alice should be present (either from LLM extraction or user-provided)
            assert "alice" in entity_names, "Entity 'Alice' should be linked"

            logger.info("✓ User-provided entities successfully merged with extracted entities")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)


def test_recall_result_model_empty_construction():
    """
    Test that RecallResultModel can be constructed with empty results.

    This is a regression test for the bug where constructing an empty RecallResultModel
    would cause an UnboundLocalError because RecallResult was imported as RecallResultModel
    but the code mistakenly used the wrong name.

    The fix ensures RecallResultModel is used consistently throughout memory_engine.py.
    """
    from hindsight_api.engine.response_models import RecallResult

    # This should not raise any errors
    result = RecallResult(results=[], entities={}, chunks={})

    assert result is not None, "Should create a result object"
    assert result.results == [], "Should have empty results"
    assert result.entities == {}, "Should have empty entities"
    assert result.chunks == {}, "Should have empty chunks"

    logger.info("✓ RecallResult empty construction works correctly")


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_custom_extraction_mode():
    """
    Test that custom extraction mode uses custom guidelines from env variable.

    This test verifies that when HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_EXTRACTION_MODE=custom and
    HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_CUSTOM_INSTRUCTIONS is set, the fact extraction uses the
    custom guidelines while keeping structural parts intact.
    """
    import os
    from hindsight_api import LLMConfig
    from hindsight_api.engine.retain.fact_extraction import extract_facts_from_text
    from hindsight_api.config import clear_config_cache, _get_raw_config

    # Save original env vars
    original_mode = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_EXTRACTION_MODE")
    original_instructions = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_CUSTOM_INSTRUCTIONS")

    try:
        # Set custom extraction mode with challenging language-specific guidelines
        os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_EXTRACTION_MODE"] = "custom"
        os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_CUSTOM_INSTRUCTIONS"] = """ONLY extract facts that are in ITALIAN language.

DO NOT extract:
❌ Facts in English
❌ Facts in any other language besides Italian

If the text contains both Italian and English content, extract ONLY the Italian facts."""

        # Clear config cache to pick up new env vars
        clear_config_cache()

        # Test content with BOTH Italian (should extract) and English (should NOT extract) facts
        # This is a much harder test than filtering greetings
        text = """
        The team discussed the new architecture. We will use microservices.

        Il database PostgreSQL ha ridotto la latenza delle query del 60%.
        Alice ha suggerito di usare il connection pooling per migliorare le prestazioni.

        Bob mentioned that the API endpoint is ready for testing.
        The deployment pipeline has been updated to use Kubernetes.

        Marco ha completato la revisione del codice e ha approvato le modifiche.
        Il sistema di autenticazione è stato migrato a OAuth 2.0.
        """

        llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()

        facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
            text=text,
            event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
            context="team meeting notes",
            llm_config=llm_config,
            agent_name="TestUser",
            config=_get_raw_config(),
        )

        logger.info(f"\nExtracted {len(facts)} facts with custom mode (Italian only):")
        for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
            logger.info(f"  {i+1}. {fact.fact}")

        assert len(facts) > 0, "Should extract at least one Italian fact"

        # All facts text
        all_facts_text = " ".join([f.fact for f in facts])

        # Should HAVE Italian content
        italian_keywords = ["postgresql", "latenza", "query", "alice", "connection pooling", "prestazioni",
                          "marco", "revisione", "codice", "autenticazione", "oauth"]
        has_italian = any(keyword in all_facts_text.lower() for keyword in italian_keywords)
        assert has_italian, f"Should extract Italian facts. Got: {all_facts_text}"

        # Should NOT have English-only content
        # These are facts that appear ONLY in English sections
        english_only_keywords = ["microservices", "bob", "api endpoint", "testing", "deployment pipeline", "kubernetes"]

        # Check if facts contain English-only content (this would be wrong)
        facts_lower = all_facts_text.lower()
        found_english_only = [kw for kw in english_only_keywords if kw in facts_lower]

        if found_english_only:
            logger.warning(f"⚠ Found English-only keywords in facts: {found_english_only}")
            logger.warning(f"  Facts: {all_facts_text}")
            logger.warning(f"  This may indicate the LLM is not strictly following language-specific custom guidelines")
            # Log but don't fail - LLM behavior can vary
        else:
            logger.info("✓ Successfully extracted only Italian facts, ignored English facts")

        # At least verify we have some Italian indicators
        italian_indicators = ["latenza", "prestazioni", "revisione", "codice", "autenticazione"]
        italian_count = sum(1 for ind in italian_indicators if ind in facts_lower)

        assert italian_count >= 1, \
            f"Should extract facts with Italian words. Found {italian_count} Italian indicators in: {all_facts_text}"

        logger.info("✓ Custom extraction mode works with language-specific guidelines")
        logger.info(f"✓ Extracted {len(facts)} Italian facts, found {italian_count} Italian indicators")

    finally:
        # Restore original env vars
        if original_mode is not None:
            os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_EXTRACTION_MODE"] = original_mode
        else:
            os.environ.pop("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_EXTRACTION_MODE", None)

        if original_instructions is not None:
            os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_CUSTOM_INSTRUCTIONS"] = original_instructions
        else:
            os.environ.pop("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_CUSTOM_INSTRUCTIONS", None)

        # Clear cache again to restore original config
        clear_config_cache()


@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_retain_batch_with_per_item_tags_on_document(memory, request_context):
    """
    Test that per-item tags are correctly stored on documents.

    This test verifies the fix for a bug where per-item tags in content dictionaries
    were not being merged and passed to document tracking, causing tags to be lost
    even though they were correctly sent through the API.

    Without the fix, this test would fail because:
    - Tags are correctly passed in the content dict
    - Tags are correctly stored on memory_units (facts)
    - BUT tags were NOT stored on the document record itself
    """
    bank_id = f"test_doc_tags_{datetime.now(timezone.utc).timestamp()}"
    document_id = "app-state-testuser"

    try:
        # Retain content with per-item tags (simulating the TasteAI use case)
        contents = [
            {
                "content": '{"username":"testuser","meals":[],"preferences":{"nickname":"testuser"}}',
                "document_id": document_id,
                "tags": ["user:testuser", "app-type:taste-ai"],
            }
        ]

        result = await memory.retain_batch_async(
            bank_id=bank_id,
            contents=contents,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert len(result) > 0, "Should have retained content"
        print(f"\n=== Retained content with tags ===")

        # Retrieve the document
        doc = await memory.get_document(
            document_id=document_id,
            bank_id=bank_id,
            request_context=request_context,
        )

        assert doc is not None, "Document should exist"
        assert "tags" in doc, "Document should have tags field"

        # This is the critical assertion - tags should be stored on the document
        doc_tags = doc["tags"] or []
        print(f"Document tags: {doc_tags}")

        assert "user:testuser" in doc_tags, \
            f"Document should have 'user:testuser' tag, but got: {doc_tags}"
        assert "app-type:taste-ai" in doc_tags, \
            f"Document should have 'app-type:taste-ai' tag, but got: {doc_tags}"

        print("✓ Per-item tags correctly stored on document")

    finally:
        await memory.delete_bank(bank_id, request_context=request_context)
        print(f"\n=== Cleaned up bank: {bank_id} ===")


def test_retain_mission_injected_into_prompt():
    """Test that retain_mission is injected as a FOCUS section into any extraction mode."""
    from unittest.mock import MagicMock
    from hindsight_api.engine.retain.fact_extraction import _build_extraction_prompt_and_schema

    spec = "Focus on technical decisions and architecture choices only."

    # Test with concise mode
    config = MagicMock()
    config.retain_extraction_mode = "concise"
    config.retain_mission = spec
    config.retain_custom_instructions = None
    config.retain_extract_causal_links = False

    prompt, _ = _build_extraction_prompt_and_schema(config)
    assert spec in prompt
    assert "FOCUS" in prompt

    # retain_mission is present regardless of extraction mode (verbose has its own template, no spec injection)
    config.retain_extraction_mode = "verbose"
    prompt_verbose, _ = _build_extraction_prompt_and_schema(config)
    # verbose uses its own template - spec not injected there
    assert spec not in prompt_verbose


def test_retain_mission_absent_when_not_set():
    """Test that no FOCUS section appears when retain_mission is not set."""
    from unittest.mock import MagicMock
    from hindsight_api.engine.retain.fact_extraction import _build_extraction_prompt_and_schema

    config = MagicMock()
    config.retain_extraction_mode = "concise"
    config.retain_mission = None
    config.retain_custom_instructions = None
    config.retain_extract_causal_links = False

    prompt, _ = _build_extraction_prompt_and_schema(config)
    assert "FOCUS" not in prompt
    assert "retain_mission_section" not in prompt


def test_retain_mission_config_loaded_from_env():
    """Test that retain_mission is loaded from env and is a configurable field."""
    import os
    from hindsight_api.config import HindsightConfig, _get_raw_config, clear_config_cache

    original = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_MISSION")
    try:
        os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_MISSION"] = "Only technical decisions."
        clear_config_cache()
        config = _get_raw_config()
        assert config.retain_mission == "Only technical decisions."
        assert "retain_mission" in HindsightConfig.get_configurable_fields()
    finally:
        if original is None:
            os.environ.pop("HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_MISSION", None)
        else:
            os.environ["HINDSIGHT_API_RETAIN_MISSION"] = original
        clear_config_cache()
