""" Unit tests for proof_count boost in reranking. """ from datetime import datetime, timezone import pytest from uuid import uuid4 from hindsight_api.engine.search.types import RetrievalResult, MergedCandidate, ScoredResult from hindsight_api.engine.search.reranking import apply_combined_scoring UTC = timezone.utc def create_mock_scored_result(proof_count: int | None = None, ce_score: float = 0.8) -> ScoredResult: """Helper to create a minimal ScoredResult suitable for scoring tests.""" retrieval = RetrievalResult( id=uuid4(), text="Test mock fact", fact_type="observation" if proof_count is not None else "world", document_id=uuid4(), chunk_id=uuid4(), embedding=[0.1]*384, similarity=0.9, proof_count=proof_count, # Default neutral dates for testing so only proof_count changes score occurred_start=datetime.now(UTC), occurred_end=datetime.now(UTC) ) candidate = MergedCandidate( id=retrieval.id, retrieval=retrieval, semantic_rank=1, bm25_rank=1, rrf_score=0.1 ) return ScoredResult( candidate=candidate, cross_encoder_score=ce_score, cross_encoder_score_normalized=ce_score, weight=ce_score, ) def test_proof_count_neutral_when_none(): """Test that when proof_count is None (e.g. non-observation), it gets neutral 0.5 norm.""" sr = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=None, ce_score=0.8) now = datetime.now(UTC) apply_combined_scoring([sr], now, proof_count_alpha=0.1) # Neutral multiplier means score shouldn't be boosted by proof_count # Since recency is neutral (just created) and temporal is neutral, score should remain unchanged assert sr.combined_score == pytest.approx(0.8, rel=1e-3) def test_proof_count_neutral_at_one(): """Test that proof_count=1 gives neutral multiplier.""" sr = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=1, ce_score=0.8) now = datetime.now(UTC) apply_combined_scoring([sr], now, proof_count_alpha=0.1) # proof_count=1 -> math.log(1) = 0 -> 0.5 + 0/10 = 0.5 (neutral) -> multiplier 1.0 assert sr.combined_score == pytest.approx(0.8, rel=1e-3) def test_proof_count_increases_with_higher_counts(): """Test that higher proof counts yield strictly higher scores.""" now = datetime.now(UTC) # Create results with increasing proof counts sr_5 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=5, ce_score=0.8) sr_50 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=50, ce_score=0.8) sr_100 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=100, ce_score=0.8) # Process them apply_combined_scoring([sr_5, sr_50, sr_100], now, proof_count_alpha=0.1) # Assure scores strictly increase assert sr_5.combined_score > 0.8 assert sr_50.combined_score > sr_5.combined_score assert sr_100.combined_score > sr_50.combined_score def test_proof_count_no_hardcoded_cap_at_100(): """Test that proof_count continues to scale within the clamped [0, 1] range.""" now = datetime.now(UTC) # Use values that stay below the clamp ceiling (proof_norm < 1.0) # log(5)/10=0.16, log(20)/10=0.30, log(100)/10=0.46 → all below 0.5 headroom sr_5 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=5, ce_score=0.8) sr_20 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=20, ce_score=0.8) sr_100 = create_mock_scored_result(proof_count=100, ce_score=0.8) apply_combined_scoring([sr_5, sr_20, sr_100], now, proof_count_alpha=0.1) # Must strictly increase within the valid range assert sr_20.combined_score > sr_5.combined_score assert sr_100.combined_score > sr_20.combined_score