* feat: implement hierarchical configuration (system, tenant, bank) * feat: implement hierarchical configuration (system, tenant, bank) * docs: add instructions for hierarchical config in CLAUDE.md * feat: add ENABLE_BANK_CONFIG_API flag (disabled by default) - Add HINDSIGHT_API_ENABLE_BANK_CONFIG_API env var (default: false) - Return 403 Forbidden from bank config endpoints when disabled - Update tests to enable the flag - Update CLAUDE.md documentation This provides security control over the bank configuration API, ensuring it's only accessible when explicitly enabled. * docs: add hierarchical configuration section * feat(cli): add bank config commands (config, set-config, reset-config) - Add 'hindsight bank config' to view bank configuration - Add 'hindsight bank set-config' to update LLM settings per bank - Add 'hindsight bank reset-config' to reset to defaults - Implements client API calls to new bank config endpoints * fix(cli): fix compilation errors in bank config commands - Fix type signature: use ApiClient instead of api::Client - Fix confirmation: use ui::prompt_confirmation instead of ui::confirm - Fix error handling: use anyhow! macro instead of errors::Error - Fix type conversion: convert HashMap to serde_json::Map for API call * feat: implement type-safe hierarchical config with bank overrides Implements a production-ready hierarchical configuration system that prevents accidentally using global defaults when bank-specific overrides exist. - Created StaticConfigProxy that wraps HindsightConfig - get_config() now returns proxy that blocks access to bank-configurable fields - Raises ConfigFieldAccessError with clear message when accessing configurable fields - Added _get_raw_config() for internal use only - Forces developers to use resolve_full_config(bank_id, context) for bank settings - Added resolve_full_config() method that returns complete HindsightConfig - Resolves hierarchy: Global (env) → Tenant → Bank - No caching to support multi-server deployments (always fresh from DB) - LLM provider pooling handles expensive operations separately - Updated entire retain pipeline to pass resolved config through call chain - memory_engine.py: Resolves config at top level where bank_id/context available - orchestrator.py: Accepts and passes config to fact_extraction - fact_extraction.py: Uses passed config instead of get_config() - utils.py: Added optional config param for backward compatibility - consolidator.py: Uses resolve_full_config() for enable_observations check - memory_engine.py: Resolves config before triggering consolidation - Renamed "Memory Bank" to "Bank Configuration" with tabs - Combined Stats and Operations into "General" tab - Consolidated Profile and Configuration into "Configuration" tab - Moved Actions dropdown to page level (outside tabs) - Created new component for managing bank-specific config - Displays configurable fields: retain_chunk_size, retain_extraction_mode, etc. - Edit via dialog with form validation - Reset to defaults via AlertDialog confirmation - Shows field IDs in monospace for clarity - Visual separation with borders and hover effects - Removed inline edit mode, switched to dialog-based editing - Separate dialogs for Disposition and Mission editing - Read-only display with clear edit buttons - Removed duplicate stats cards and operations - bank-stats-view.tsx: Overview statistics (memories, links, documents, pending ops) - bank-operations-view.tsx: Background operations table with filtering **Problem**: Consolidation always used global enable_observations, ignoring bank overrides **Root Cause**: consolidator.py called get_config() instead of resolving bank-specific config **Solution**: Pass resolved config through the entire pipeline **Problem**: asyncpg returning JSONB as JSON string instead of parsed dict **Solution**: Explicit JSON parsing in config_resolver.py with type checking - All 19 API integration tests pass - All 10 hierarchical config tests pass - Retain operations work correctly with bank-specific config - Consolidation respects bank-specific enable_observations setting - Updated developer/configuration.md with type-safe config access pattern - Added examples showing correct usage patterns - Documented ConfigFieldAccessError and resolution methods - get_config() now returns StaticConfigProxy (blocks configurable field access) - Code accessing bank-configurable fields must use resolve_full_config() - Clear migration path with helpful error messages Fixes hierarchical configuration to be production-ready with proper type safety. * refactor: remove LLM client pool and simplify config resolver Since LLM config (provider, model, api_key) is now static and not bank-configurable, the LLMClientPool is no longer needed. Changes: - Remove hindsight_api/llm_client_pool.py (no longer needed) - Remove memory_engine._get_bank_llm_config() (dead code, never called) - Simplify config_resolver.py by eliminating duplication between resolve_full_config() and get_bank_config() - get_bank_config() now calls resolve_full_config() and filters results - Remove outdated "LLM provider pooling" comments from docstrings All tests pass (10 hierarchical config tests, 19 API integration tests) * fix: update tests to use _get_raw_config() for configurable fields Fixed test fixtures that were accessing configurable fields (like enable_observations) from get_config(), which now raises ConfigFieldAccessError due to type-safe config access. Changes: - test_consolidation.py: Changed enable_observations fixture to use _get_raw_config() instead of get_config() - test_consolidation.py: Updated test_consolidation_returns_disabled_status to set bank config instead of mocking get_config() - test_link_expansion_retrieval.py: Changed fixture to use _get_raw_config() - test_observations.py: Changed disable_observations fixture to use _get_raw_config() - Regenerated OpenAPI spec and clients All 39 previously failing tests now pass. * fix: add missing config parameter to test calls of extract_facts_from_text() Fixed 45 test failures where tests were calling extract_facts_from_text() without the new required config parameter. Changes: - Added config=_get_raw_config() to all extract_facts_from_text() calls - Fixed test_main_module.py to patch _get_raw_config instead of get_config - Updated 6 test files with 37 function call sites All tests should now pass. * fix: add missing config parameter to test_skip_podcast_meta_commentary One more test was missing the config parameter for extract_facts_from_text().
208 lines
8.4 KiB
Python
208 lines
8.4 KiB
Python
"""
|
|
Test suite for causal relationship extraction.
|
|
|
|
Tests that the fact extraction system correctly identifies and validates
|
|
causal relationships between facts, with valid indices.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from datetime import datetime
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from hindsight_api import LLMConfig
|
|
from hindsight_api.config import _get_raw_config
|
|
from hindsight_api.engine.retain.fact_extraction import extract_facts_from_text
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestCausalRelationships:
|
|
"""Tests for causal relationship extraction and validation."""
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_causal_chain_extraction(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a clear causal chain is extracted with valid relationships.
|
|
|
|
Story: Lost job -> couldn't pay rent -> had to move -> found new apartment
|
|
|
|
This is a 4-fact causal chain where each fact causes the next.
|
|
The extracted causal relations should have valid indices (0-3).
|
|
"""
|
|
text = """
|
|
I lost my job at the tech company in January because of layoffs.
|
|
Because I lost my job, I couldn't pay my rent anymore.
|
|
Since I couldn't afford rent, I had to move out of my apartment.
|
|
After searching for weeks, I finally found a cheaper apartment in Brooklyn.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
context = "Personal story about housing change"
|
|
llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()
|
|
|
|
facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
|
|
text=text, event_date=datetime(2024, 3, 15), context=context, llm_config=llm_config, agent_name="TestUser",
|
|
config=_get_raw_config(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert len(facts) >= 3, f"Should extract at least 3 facts from the causal chain. Got {len(facts)}"
|
|
|
|
# Collect all causal relations from all facts
|
|
all_causal_relations = []
|
|
for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
|
|
if fact.causal_relations:
|
|
for rel in fact.causal_relations:
|
|
all_causal_relations.append(
|
|
{
|
|
"from_fact_index": i,
|
|
"to_fact_index": rel.target_fact_index,
|
|
"relation_type": rel.relation_type,
|
|
"strength": rel.strength,
|
|
"from_fact_text": fact.fact[:50],
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that ALL causal relation indices are valid
|
|
# New constraint: target_index must be < from_fact_index (can only reference PREVIOUS facts)
|
|
num_facts = len(facts)
|
|
invalid_relations = []
|
|
for rel in all_causal_relations:
|
|
# Must be non-negative and less than the current fact's index
|
|
if rel["to_fact_index"] < 0 or rel["to_fact_index"] >= rel["from_fact_index"]:
|
|
invalid_relations.append(rel)
|
|
|
|
assert len(invalid_relations) == 0, (
|
|
f"Found {len(invalid_relations)} causal relations with invalid indices! "
|
|
f"Each target_fact_index must be < from_fact_index (can only reference previous facts). "
|
|
f"Invalid relations: {invalid_relations}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Should have at least some causal relations extracted
|
|
assert len(all_causal_relations) >= 2, (
|
|
f"Should extract at least 2 causal relationships from this clear chain. "
|
|
f"Got {len(all_causal_relations)}: {all_causal_relations}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Verify relation types are valid (passive only - facts reference PREVIOUS facts)
|
|
valid_types = {"caused_by", "enabled_by", "prevented_by"}
|
|
for rel in all_causal_relations:
|
|
assert rel["relation_type"] in valid_types, (
|
|
f"Invalid relation_type '{rel['relation_type']}'. Must be one of {valid_types}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_complex_causal_web(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test a more complex scenario with multiple interconnected causes.
|
|
|
|
This tests the LLM's ability to identify multiple causal links and
|
|
ensure all referenced indices exist.
|
|
"""
|
|
text = """
|
|
The heavy rain caused flooding in the basement.
|
|
The flooding damaged the electrical system.
|
|
Because of the electrical damage, we had to call an electrician.
|
|
The electrician found that the wiring was old and needed replacement.
|
|
We decided to renovate the entire basement while fixing the wiring.
|
|
The renovation took three months and cost $15,000.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
context = "Home repair story"
|
|
llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()
|
|
|
|
facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
|
|
text=text, event_date=datetime(2024, 6, 1), context=context, llm_config=llm_config, agent_name="TestUser",
|
|
config=_get_raw_config(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert len(facts) >= 4, f"Should extract at least 4 facts. Got {len(facts)}"
|
|
|
|
# Validate all causal relation indices (must reference PREVIOUS facts only)
|
|
for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
|
|
if fact.causal_relations:
|
|
for rel in fact.causal_relations:
|
|
assert 0 <= rel.target_fact_index < i, (
|
|
f"Fact {i} has causal relation to invalid index {rel.target_fact_index}. "
|
|
f"Must reference previous facts only (valid range: 0 to {i - 1}). "
|
|
f"Fact text: {fact.fact[:80]}..."
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_no_self_referencing_causal_relations(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that facts don't have causal relations pointing to themselves.
|
|
"""
|
|
text = """
|
|
I started learning Python because I wanted to automate my work tasks.
|
|
Learning Python led me to discover machine learning.
|
|
Machine learning fascinated me so much that I changed my career to data science.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
context = "Career change story"
|
|
llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()
|
|
|
|
facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
|
|
text=text, event_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), context=context, llm_config=llm_config, agent_name="TestUser",
|
|
config=_get_raw_config(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Check no fact references itself
|
|
for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
|
|
if fact.causal_relations:
|
|
for rel in fact.causal_relations:
|
|
assert rel.target_fact_index != i, (
|
|
f"Fact {i} has a self-referencing causal relation! Fact text: {fact.fact}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_bidirectional_causal_relationships(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that bidirectional causal relationships (causes and caused_by)
|
|
are handled correctly.
|
|
"""
|
|
text = """
|
|
My promotion at work caused me to move to New York.
|
|
Moving to New York was caused by my promotion at work.
|
|
The new role enabled me to lead a team of engineers.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
context = "Work promotion story"
|
|
llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()
|
|
|
|
facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
|
|
text=text, event_date=datetime(2024, 2, 15), context=context, llm_config=llm_config, agent_name="TestUser",
|
|
config=_get_raw_config(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Validate all indices (must reference PREVIOUS facts only)
|
|
for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
|
|
if fact.causal_relations:
|
|
for rel in fact.causal_relations:
|
|
assert 0 <= rel.target_fact_index < i, (
|
|
f"Invalid target_fact_index {rel.target_fact_index} in fact {i}. "
|
|
f"Must reference previous facts only (valid range: 0 to {i - 1})"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_causal_relation_strength_values(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that causal relation strength values are within valid range [0.0, 1.0].
|
|
"""
|
|
text = """
|
|
The stock market crash directly caused the company to lay off employees.
|
|
The layoffs indirectly led to reduced consumer spending in the area.
|
|
Reduced spending somewhat affected local businesses.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
context = "Economic impact story"
|
|
llm_config = LLMConfig.for_memory()
|
|
|
|
facts, _, _ = await extract_facts_from_text(
|
|
text=text, event_date=datetime(2024, 4, 1), context=context, llm_config=llm_config, agent_name="TestUser",
|
|
config=_get_raw_config(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for i, fact in enumerate(facts):
|
|
if fact.causal_relations:
|
|
for rel in fact.causal_relations:
|
|
assert 0.0 <= rel.strength <= 1.0, (
|
|
f"Causal relation strength {rel.strength} is outside valid range [0.0, 1.0]. "
|
|
f"Fact {i}: {fact.fact[:50]}..."
|
|
)
|