fleet-memory/hindsight-dev/benchmarks/common/benchmark_runner.py
Nicolò Boschi 30a319a6ab
feat: bank template import/export with Template Hub (#819)
* feat(api): add bank template import/export endpoints

Add POST /banks/{bank_id}/import and GET /banks/{bank_id}/export
endpoints for declarative bank setup via JSON manifests.

A template manifest (version 1) can include bank config overrides
and mental model definitions. Import creates or updates mental
models matched by id, applies config as per-bank overrides, and
returns async operation IDs for content generation.

Export dumps a bank's explicit overrides and mental models as a
manifest that can be re-imported into another bank.

Includes control plane UI: bank creation dialog now accepts an
optional template JSON to pre-configure the bank on creation.

* docs: add Template Gallery page and bank templates reference

- Template Gallery (/templates) with search, category filter, manifest
  preview modal with copy-to-clipboard
- 5 starter templates: Customer Support, Research Assistant, Personal
  Journal, Code Review Buddy, Meeting Notes
- Bank Templates API reference doc (developer/api/bank-templates)
- Sidebar entry under API section

* docs: add Template Gallery links to navbar and sidebar

- Top navbar: "Templates" link between Integrations and Changelog
- Sidebar: "Template Gallery" in Resources section

* fix(docs): remove emoji icons, autofocus search, fix placeholder in template gallery

* docs: rename to Bank Templates, move to Resources sidebar only

* docs: add Bank Templates to Resources navbar dropdown

* feat(api): add directives to bank template import/export

- Add BankTemplateDirective model with name, content, priority, is_active, tags
- Import creates/updates directives matched by name
- Export includes all directives (active and inactive)
- Validation: duplicate names rejected, empty name/content caught
- Tests: 24 tests covering directives create/update, existing vs new
  bank import, validation, export with directives, full round-trip

* docs: add directives to bank templates docs and sample templates

* feat(api): add JSON Schema endpoint for bank template validation

- GET /v1/default/bank-template-schema returns the JSON Schema
  auto-generated from the Pydantic BankTemplateManifest model
- Static schema file at docs/static/bank-template-schema.json
- Docs updated with schema endpoint, static file link, and
  validation examples (Python jsonschema, Node ajv-cli)

* feat(api): live schema validation on import, fix schema endpoint path

- Move schema endpoint to /v1/bank-template-schema (system-level, not per-bank)
- Import endpoint now accepts raw JSON and validates with Pydantic manually,
  returning clean 400 errors instead of raw 422s for all validation failures
- All validation (schema + semantic) returns consistent 400 with detailed messages

* docs: add interactive JSON Schema viewer to Bank Templates page

Renders the Pydantic-generated schema as a collapsible property tree
with types, required badges, defaults, and descriptions. The schema
is imported from the static bank-template-schema.json file.

* ui: add template toggle switch and browse link to bank creation dialog

- Replace always-visible textarea with a switch toggle ("Import from template")
- Textarea only shows when switch is on, keeping the dialog clean by default
- Add "Browse templates" link pointing to hindsight.vectorize.io/templates
- Reset template state when switch is toggled off or dialog is cancelled

* ui: add empty state with Add Document CTA to data view

When a bank has 0 memories, the data view (all tabs: constellation,
graph, table, timeline) shows a centered empty state with a CTA
button that opens the Add Document dialog.

* docs: replace templates with Conversation and Coding Agent

Remove generic placeholder templates. Add two practical templates
based on actual integration patterns:

- Conversation: for chat agents (LiteLLM, LangGraph, Pydantic AI,
  Vercel AI SDK). Tracks user preferences, open threads.
- Coding Agent: for Claude Code/Codex. Tracks technical decisions,
  project context, developer preferences. High literalism.

* docs: rename gallery to Bank Templates Hub, keep API doc as Bank Templates

* docs: register layout-template and file-json icons in navbar and sidebar

* docs: register layout-template icon in DefaultNavbarItem for dropdown items

* docs: show integration icons on template cards

Templates now have an optional `integrations` field referencing
integration IDs from integrations.json. Icons are resolved at render
time and shown in the card header next to the category badge.

* docs: add Personal Assistant template for OpenClaw, Hermes, NemoClaw

* feat: add Export Template to bank actions + map all integrations to templates

- Add "Export Template" to the bank Actions dropdown — exports config,
  mental models, and directives as JSON, copies to clipboard
- Add export API route and client method
- Map remaining integrations to templates: CrewAI, AG2, Agno, Strands,
  LlamaIndex, local-mcp, skills → Conversation; hindclaw → Personal Assistant

* feat: add --template flag to LoCoMo benchmark + remove schema from Hub

- LoCoMo benchmark accepts --template <path> to apply a bank template
  manifest (config, mental models, directives) before ingestion
- Template is applied per-bank in both single-phase and two-phase modes
- BenchmarkRunner.apply_template() reuses the same engine methods as
  the /import API endpoint
- Remove Manifest Schema section from Bank Templates Hub page
  (schema stays in the API reference doc)

* refactor: remove description field from bank template manifest

* docs: remove tags, fact_types, and directives from starter templates

* docs: remove reflect_mission and disposition fields from starter templates

* build: validate template manifests against JSON Schema during docs build

* cleanup: remove unused JsonSchemaViewer component

* docs: remove retain_extraction_mode from starter templates

* ui: enable word wrap in template manifest preview

* docs: add link to Bank Templates reference doc from Hub page

* docs: convert bank templates doc to mdx with multi-language code snippets

- Convert bank-templates.md to .mdx with Tabs/CodeSnippet components
- Add example files: bank-templates.py, .mjs, .sh, .go with doc markers
- Examples cover import, dry-run, export, round-trip, and schema
- Regenerate OpenAPI spec and all client SDKs (Python, TS, Rust, Go)

* fix: migration revision collision + use typed models in benchmark template

- Rename merge migration d6e7f8a9b0c1 -> d6e7f8a9b0c2 to resolve
  revision ID collision with case_insensitive_entities_trgm_index
- Update a4b5c6d7e8f9 down_revision to point to the renamed migration
- Fix f-string lint in case_insensitive migration
- BenchmarkRunner.apply_template() now validates manifest through
  BankTemplateManifest Pydantic model instead of raw dict access
- Remove redundant inline imports (json, Path already at module top)

* fix(docs): add missing Go tab to dry-run code snippet

* ci: retrigger

* fix: sync skills openapi.json + fix bankId null type error in export

- Copy updated openapi.json to skills/hindsight-docs/references/
- Add null guard for bankId in Export Template onClick handler

* fix: sync generated files (memory_engine formatting, docs skill references)

* cleanup: remove obsolete migration collision workaround
2026-04-02 12:21:53 +02:00

1593 lines
65 KiB
Python

"""
Common benchmark runner framework based on the LoComo implementation.
This module provides a unified interface for running benchmarks with the same
optimizations as the working LoComo benchmark:
- Batch ingestion for speed
- Parallel question processing with semaphores
- Parallel LLM judging with rate limiting
- Progress tracking with Rich
- Comprehensive metrics collection
- Support for both traditional (search + LLM) and integrated (think API) approaches
The framework supports two answer generation patterns:
1. Traditional: Benchmark runner performs search, then passes results to answer generator
2. Integrated: Answer generator performs its own retrieval (e.g., think API)
- Indicated by needs_external_search() returning False
- Skips the search step for efficiency
"""
import asyncio
import json
import logging
import os
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
import pydantic
from hindsight_api import MemoryEngine
from hindsight_api.config import get_config
# Configure logging from environment variable
get_config().configure_logging()
from hindsight_api.engine.memory_engine import Budget
from hindsight_api.models import RequestContext
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from rich import box
from rich.console import Console
from rich.progress import BarColumn, Progress, SpinnerColumn, TextColumn
from rich.table import Table
console = Console()
def get_model_config() -> Dict[str, Dict[str, str]]:
"""
Get the model configuration for all three LLM roles.
Reads directly from environment variables without instantiating LLM clients.
Returns:
Dict with 'hindsight', 'answer_generation', and 'judge' keys,
each containing 'provider' and 'model' info.
"""
# Memory/Hindsight config (base config)
memory_provider = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_PROVIDER", "groq")
memory_model = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_MODEL", "openai/gpt-oss-120b")
# Answer generation config (falls back to memory config)
answer_provider = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_ANSWER_LLM_PROVIDER", memory_provider)
answer_model = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_ANSWER_LLM_MODEL", memory_model)
# Judge config (falls back to memory config)
judge_provider = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_PROVIDER", memory_provider)
judge_model = os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_MODEL", memory_model)
return {
"hindsight": {
"provider": memory_provider,
"model": memory_model,
},
"answer_generation": {
"provider": answer_provider,
"model": answer_model,
},
"judge": {
"provider": judge_provider,
"model": judge_model,
},
}
def print_model_config():
"""Print the model configuration to console."""
config = get_model_config()
console.print("\n[bold cyan]Model Configuration:[/bold cyan]")
console.print(f" Hindsight: {config['hindsight']['provider']}/{config['hindsight']['model']}")
console.print(
f" Answer Generation: {config['answer_generation']['provider']}/{config['answer_generation']['model']}"
)
console.print(f" LLM Judge: {config['judge']['provider']}/{config['judge']['model']}")
console.print()
async def create_memory_engine() -> MemoryEngine:
"""
Create and initialize a MemoryEngine instance from environment variables.
Reads configuration from:
- HINDSIGHT_API_DATABASE_URL (default: "pg0")
- HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_PROVIDER (default: "groq")
- HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_API_KEY
- HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_MODEL (default: "openai/gpt-oss-120b")
- HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_BASE_URL (optional)
Returns:
Initialized MemoryEngine instance
"""
memory = MemoryEngine(
db_url=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_DATABASE_URL", "pg0"),
memory_llm_provider=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_PROVIDER", "groq"),
memory_llm_api_key=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_API_KEY"),
memory_llm_model=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_MODEL", "openai/gpt-oss-120b"),
memory_llm_base_url=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_BASE_URL") or None, # Use None to get provider defaults
)
await memory.initialize()
return memory
class BenchmarkDataset(ABC):
"""Abstract base class for benchmark datasets."""
@abstractmethod
def load(self, path: Path, max_items: Optional[int] = None) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""
Load dataset from file.
Returns:
List of dataset items
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
def get_item_id(self, item: Dict) -> str:
"""Get unique identifier for an item."""
pass
@abstractmethod
def prepare_sessions_for_ingestion(self, item: Dict) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""
Prepare conversation sessions for batch ingestion.
Returns:
List of session dicts with keys: 'content', 'context', 'event_date'
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
def get_qa_pairs(self, item: Dict) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""
Extract QA pairs from an item.
Returns:
List of QA dicts with keys: 'question', 'answer', 'category' (optional)
"""
pass
class LLMAnswerGenerator(ABC):
"""Abstract base class for LLM-based answer generation."""
def needs_external_search(self) -> bool:
"""
Whether this generator needs external search to be performed.
Returns:
True if the benchmark runner should perform search before calling generate_answer.
False if the generator does its own retrieval (e.g., integrated think API).
"""
return True
@abstractmethod
async def generate_answer(
self,
question: str,
recall_result: Dict[str, Any],
question_date: Optional[datetime] = None,
question_type: Optional[str] = None,
bank_id: Optional[str] = None,
) -> Tuple[str, str, Optional[List[Dict[str, Any]]]]:
"""
Generate answer from retrieved memories.
Args:
question: The question text
recall_result: Full RecallResult dict containing results, entities, chunks, and trace
question_date: Optional date when the question was asked (for temporal context)
question_type: Optional question category/type (e.g., 'multi-session', 'temporal-reasoning')
bank_id: Optional bank ID for generators that need it (e.g., ReflectAnswerGenerator)
Returns:
Tuple of (answer, reasoning, retrieved_memories_override)
- answer: The generated answer text
- reasoning: Explanation of how the answer was derived
- retrieved_memories_override: Optional list of memories to include in results
- None: Use memories from recall_result (traditional mode)
- List: Use these memories instead (integrated mode like think API)
"""
pass
class JudgeResponse(pydantic.BaseModel):
"""Judge response format."""
correct: bool
reasoning: str
class LLMAnswerEvaluator:
"""LLM-based answer evaluator with configurable provider."""
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize with LLM configuration for judge/evaluator.
Uses HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_* env vars with fallback to HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_* for
benchmark-specific LLM configuration (separate from the API config system).
"""
import os
from hindsight_api.engine.llm_wrapper import LLMConfig
self.llm_config = LLMConfig(
provider=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_PROVIDER", os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_PROVIDER", "openai")),
api_key=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_API_KEY", os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_API_KEY", "")),
base_url=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_BASE_URL", os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_BASE_URL", "")),
model=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_JUDGE_LLM_MODEL", os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_MODEL", "gpt-4o-mini")),
reasoning_effort="high",
)
self.client = self.llm_config._client
self.model = self.llm_config.model
async def judge_answer(
self,
question: str,
correct_answer: str,
predicted_answer: str,
semaphore: asyncio.Semaphore,
category: Optional[str] = None,
max_retries: int = 3,
) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
"""
Evaluate predicted answer using LLM-as-judge with category-specific prompts.
Args:
question: The question
correct_answer: Gold/correct answer
predicted_answer: Predicted answer
semaphore: Semaphore for rate limiting
category: Question category for LongMemEval-specific evaluation
max_retries: Maximum retry attempts for validation errors
Returns:
Tuple of (is_correct, reasoning)
"""
async with semaphore:
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
# LongMemEval-specific evaluation prompts
if category in ["single-session-user", "single-session-assistant", "multi-session"]:
prompt_content = f"""Evaluate if the model response contains the correct answer to the question.
I will give you a question, a correct answer, and a response from a model.
Please set correct=true if the response contains the correct answer. Otherwise, set correct=no.
If the response is equivalent to the correct answer or contains all the intermediate steps to get the correct answer, you should also set correct=true.
If the response only contains a subset of the information required by the answer, set correct=false
Question: {question}
Correct Answer: {correct_answer}
Model Response: {predicted_answer}
Evaluation criteria:
- Set correct=true if the response contains the correct answer
- Set correct=true if the response is equivalent to the correct answer or contains intermediate steps
- Set correct=false if the response is incorrect or missing key information
Provide your evaluation as JSON with:
- reasoning: One sentence explanation
- correct: true or false"""
elif category == "temporal-reasoning":
prompt_content = """
I will give you a question, a correct answer, and a response from a model.
Please set correct=true if the response contains the correct answer. Otherwise, set correct=false.
If the response is equivalent to the correct answer or contains all the intermediate steps to get the correct answer, you should also set correct=true.
If the response only contains a subset of the information required by the answer, answer correct=false.
In addition, do not penalize off-by-one errors for the number of days. If the question asks for the number of days/weeks/months, etc., and the model makes off-by-one errors (e.g., predicting 19 days when the answer is 18), the model's response is still correct.
"""
elif category == "knowledge-update":
prompt_content = """
I will give you a question, a correct answer, and a response from a model.
Please set correct=true if the response contains the correct answer. Otherwise, set correct=false.
If the response contains some previous information along with an updated answer, the response should be considered as correct as long as the updated answer is the required answer.
"""
elif category == "single-session-preference":
prompt_content = """
I will give you a question, a answer for desired personalized response, and a response from a model.
Please set correct=true if the response satisfies the desired response. Otherwise, set correct=false.
The model does not need to reflect all the points in the desired response. The response is correct as long as it recalls and utilizes the user's personal information correctly.
"""
else:
# Default LoComo-style evaluation
prompt_content = """Your task is to label an answer to a question as 'CORRECT' or 'WRONG'. You will be given the following data:
(1) a question (posed by one user to another user),
(2) a 'gold' (ground truth) answer,
(3) a generated answer
which you will score as CORRECT/WRONG.
The point of the question is to ask about something one user should know about the other user based on their prior conversations.
The gold answer will usually be a concise and short answer that includes the referenced topic, for example:
Question: Do you remember what I got the last time I went to Hawaii?
Gold answer: A shell necklace
The generated answer might be much longer, but you should be generous with your grading - as long as it touches on the same topic as the gold answer, it should be counted as CORRECT.
For time related questions, the gold answer will be a specific date, month, year, etc. The generated answer might be much longer or use relative time references (like "last Tuesday" or "next month"), but you should be generous with your grading - as long as it refers to the same date or time period as the gold answer, it should be counted as CORRECT. Even if the format differs (e.g., "May 7th" vs "7 May"), consider it CORRECT if it's the same date.
There's an edge case where the actual answer can't be found in the data and in that case the gold answer will say so (e.g. 'You did not mention this information.'); if the generated answer says that it cannot be answered or it doesn't know all the details, it should be counted as CORRECT.
"""
judgement = await self.llm_config.call(
messages=[
{
"role": "user",
"content": f"""{prompt_content}
Question: {question}
Gold answer: {correct_answer}
Generated answer: {predicted_answer}
First, provide a short (one sentence) explanation of your reasoning. Short reasoning is preferred.
If it's correct, set correct=true.
""",
}
],
response_format=JudgeResponse,
scope="judge",
temperature=0,
max_completion_tokens=4096,
)
return judgement.correct, judgement.reasoning
except Exception as e:
# Check if it's a validation error (LLM returned malformed JSON)
error_str = str(e)
is_validation_error = "ValidationError" in error_str or "Field required" in error_str
# Retry on validation errors, fail immediately on other errors
if is_validation_error and attempt < max_retries - 1:
print(f"Judge validation error on attempt {attempt + 1}/{max_retries}, retrying...")
await asyncio.sleep(0.5) # Small delay before retry
continue
# Final attempt or non-validation error - log and return error
print(f"Error judging answer after {attempt + 1} attempts: {e}")
return False, f"Error: {str(e)}"
class BenchmarkRunner:
"""
Common benchmark runner using the proven LoComo approach.
Optimizations:
- Batch ingestion (put_batch_async)
- Parallel question processing with rate limiting
- Parallel LLM judging with rate limiting
- Progress tracking
"""
def __init__(
self,
dataset: BenchmarkDataset,
answer_generator: LLMAnswerGenerator,
answer_evaluator: LLMAnswerEvaluator,
memory: Optional[MemoryEngine] = None,
):
"""
Initialize benchmark runner.
Args:
dataset: Dataset implementation
answer_generator: Answer generator implementation
answer_evaluator: Answer evaluator implementation
memory: Memory system instance (creates new if None)
"""
import os
self.dataset = dataset
self.answer_generator = answer_generator
self.answer_evaluator = answer_evaluator
self.template_path: Optional[str] = None
self.memory = memory or MemoryEngine(
db_url=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_DATABASE_URL", "pg0"),
memory_llm_provider=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_PROVIDER", "groq"),
memory_llm_api_key=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_API_KEY"),
memory_llm_model=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_MODEL", "openai/gpt-oss-20b"),
memory_llm_base_url=os.getenv("HINDSIGHT_API_LLM_BASE_URL") or None,
)
def calculate_data_stats(self, items: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Calculate statistics about the data to be ingested.
Returns:
Dict with statistics: total_sessions, total_chars, avg_session_length, etc.
"""
total_sessions = 0
total_chars = 0
session_lengths = []
for item in items:
batch_contents = self.dataset.prepare_sessions_for_ingestion(item)
total_sessions += len(batch_contents)
for session in batch_contents:
content_len = len(session["content"])
total_chars += content_len
session_lengths.append(content_len)
avg_length = total_chars / total_sessions if total_sessions > 0 else 0
return {
"total_sessions": total_sessions,
"total_chars": total_chars,
"total_items": len(items),
"avg_session_length": avg_length,
"min_session_length": min(session_lengths) if session_lengths else 0,
"max_session_length": max(session_lengths) if session_lengths else 0,
}
async def apply_template(self, bank_id: str, manifest_path: str) -> None:
"""Apply a bank template manifest to a bank before ingestion.
Reads the manifest JSON file and applies config overrides, creates
mental models and directives — same logic as the /import API endpoint.
"""
from hindsight_api.api.http import BankTemplateManifest
from hindsight_api.models import RequestContext
raw = json.loads(Path(manifest_path).read_text())
manifest = BankTemplateManifest.model_validate(raw)
request_context = RequestContext()
await self.memory.get_bank_profile(bank_id, request_context=request_context)
# Apply bank config overrides
if manifest.bank:
config_updates = manifest.bank.get_config_updates()
if config_updates:
await self.memory._config_resolver.update_bank_config(bank_id, config_updates, request_context)
# Create directives
for directive in manifest.directives or []:
await self.memory.create_directive(
bank_id=bank_id,
name=directive.name,
content=directive.content,
priority=directive.priority,
is_active=directive.is_active,
tags=directive.tags if directive.tags else None,
request_context=request_context,
)
# Create mental models (async content generation)
for mm in manifest.mental_models or []:
mental_model = await self.memory.create_mental_model(
bank_id=bank_id,
name=mm.name,
source_query=mm.source_query,
content="Generating content...",
mental_model_id=mm.id,
tags=mm.tags if mm.tags else None,
max_tokens=mm.max_tokens,
trigger=mm.trigger.model_dump() if mm.trigger else None,
request_context=request_context,
)
await self.memory.submit_async_refresh_mental_model(
bank_id=bank_id,
mental_model_id=mental_model["id"],
request_context=request_context,
)
async def ingest_conversation(
self, item: Dict[str, Any], agent_id: str, wait_for_consolidation: bool = False
) -> int:
"""
Ingest conversation into memory using batch ingestion.
Uses put_batch_async for maximum efficiency.
Args:
item: Dataset item to ingest
agent_id: Agent/bank ID to ingest into
wait_for_consolidation: If True, wait for consolidation to complete after ingestion
Returns:
Number of sessions ingested
"""
batch_contents = self.dataset.prepare_sessions_for_ingestion(item)
if batch_contents:
await self.memory.retain_batch_async(
bank_id=agent_id,
contents=batch_contents,
request_context=RequestContext(),
)
if wait_for_consolidation and batch_contents:
await self._wait_for_consolidation(agent_id)
return len(batch_contents)
async def _get_pending_consolidation_count(self, bank_id: str) -> int:
"""
Get the count of memories pending consolidation.
Returns:
Number of memories not yet processed by the consolidation job
"""
pool = await self.memory._get_pool()
from hindsight_api.engine.memory_engine import fq_table
async with pool.acquire() as conn:
result = await conn.fetchrow(
f"""
SELECT COUNT(*) as count
FROM {fq_table("memory_units")}
WHERE bank_id = $1 AND consolidated_at IS NULL AND fact_type IN ('experience', 'world')
""",
bank_id,
)
return result["count"] if result else 0
async def _wait_for_consolidation(self, bank_id: str, poll_interval: float = 2.0, timeout: float = 3000.0) -> None:
"""
Wait for consolidation to complete (pending_consolidation reaches 0).
Args:
bank_id: Bank ID to check
poll_interval: Seconds between polls
timeout: Maximum seconds to wait
Raises:
TimeoutError: If consolidation doesn't complete within timeout
"""
import time
start_time = time.time()
console.print(" [yellow]Waiting for consolidation to complete...[/yellow]")
while True:
elapsed = time.time() - start_time
if elapsed > timeout:
raise TimeoutError(f"Consolidation did not complete within {timeout}s")
pending = await self._get_pending_consolidation_count(bank_id)
if pending == 0:
console.print(" [green]✓[/green] Consolidation complete")
return
# Still pending, wait and poll again
await asyncio.sleep(poll_interval)
async def answer_question(
self,
agent_id: str,
question: str,
thinking_budget: int = 500,
max_tokens: int = 4096,
question_date: Optional[datetime] = None,
question_type: Optional[str] = None,
) -> Tuple[str, str, List[Dict], Dict[str, Dict]]:
"""
Answer a question using memory retrieval.
Args:
agent_id: Agent ID
question: Question text
thinking_budget: Thinking budget for search
max_tokens: Maximum tokens to retrieve
question_date: Date when the question was asked (for temporal filtering)
question_type: Question category/type (e.g., 'multi-session', 'temporal-reasoning')
Returns:
Tuple of (answer, reasoning, retrieved_memories, chunks)
"""
# Check if generator needs external search
if self.answer_generator.needs_external_search():
# Traditional flow: search then generate
# Use MemoryEngine directly
# Map thinking_budget to budget level
budget = Budget.LOW if thinking_budget <= 30 else Budget.MID if thinking_budget <= 70 else Budget.HIGH
import time
recall_start_time = time.time()
# Use default fact types (no filtering)
search_result = await self.memory.recall_async(
bank_id=agent_id,
query=question,
budget=budget,
max_tokens=max_tokens,
question_date=question_date,
include_entities=True,
max_entity_tokens=2048,
include_chunks=True,
request_context=RequestContext(),
)
recall_time = time.time() - recall_start_time
# Log recall stats
num_results = len(search_result.results) if search_result.results else 0
num_chunks = len(search_result.chunks) if search_result.chunks else 0
num_entities = len(search_result.entities) if search_result.entities else 0
# Convert entire RecallResult to dictionary for answer generation
recall_result_dict = search_result.model_dump()
# Extract chunks from search result
chunks = {}
if search_result.chunks:
for chunk_key, chunk_info in search_result.chunks.items():
chunks[chunk_key] = chunk_info.model_dump()
# Check if we have any results
if not search_result.results:
return "I don't have enough information to answer that question.", "No relevant memories found.", [], {}
# Generate answer using LLM - pass entire recall result
answer, reasoning, memories_override = await self.answer_generator.generate_answer(
question, recall_result_dict, question_date, question_type, bank_id=agent_id
)
# Use override if provided, otherwise use the results from recall
final_memories = (
memories_override
if memories_override is not None
else [fact.model_dump() for fact in search_result.results]
)
return answer, reasoning, final_memories, chunks
else:
# Integrated flow: generator does its own search (e.g., reflect API)
# Pass empty recall result since generator doesn't need them
answer, reasoning, memories_override = await self.answer_generator.generate_answer(
question, {"results": []}, question_date, question_type, bank_id=agent_id
)
# Use memories from generator (should not be None for integrated mode)
final_memories = memories_override if memories_override is not None else []
return answer, reasoning, final_memories, {}
async def evaluate_qa_task(
self,
agent_id: str,
qa_pairs: List[Dict],
item_id: str,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
max_questions: Optional[int] = None,
semaphore: asyncio.Semaphore = None,
) -> List[Dict]:
"""
Evaluate QA task with parallel question processing.
Args:
semaphore: Semaphore to limit concurrent question processing
Returns:
List of QA results
"""
# Filter out questions without answers (category 5)
# First, identify and log category 5 questions that will be skipped
category_5_questions = [pair for pair in qa_pairs if pair.get("category") == 5]
if category_5_questions:
logging.info(f"Skipping {len(category_5_questions)} category=5 questions for {item_id}")
for q in category_5_questions:
logging.debug(f" Skipped category=5 question: {q.get('question', 'N/A')[:100]}")
# Filter out category 5 and questions without answers, preserving original indices
indexed_pairs = [
(orig_idx, pair)
for orig_idx, pair in enumerate(qa_pairs)
if pair.get("category") != 5 and pair.get("answer")
]
indexed_pairs_to_eval = indexed_pairs[:max_questions] if max_questions else indexed_pairs
with Progress(
SpinnerColumn(),
TextColumn("[progress.description]{task.description}"),
BarColumn(),
TextColumn("[progress.percentage]{task.percentage:>3.0f}%"),
console=console,
) as progress:
task = progress.add_task(
f"[cyan]Evaluating QA for {item_id} - {len(indexed_pairs_to_eval)} questions",
total=len(indexed_pairs_to_eval),
)
# Create tasks for all questions
async def process_question(orig_idx: int, qa: dict):
async with semaphore:
question = qa["question"]
correct_answer = qa["answer"]
category = qa.get("category", 0)
question_date = qa.get("question_date")
try:
# Get predicted answer, reasoning, retrieved memories, and chunks
predicted_answer, reasoning, retrieved_memories, chunks = await self.answer_question(
agent_id,
question,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
question_date,
category,
)
# Remove embeddings from retrieved memories to reduce file size
memories_without_embeddings = [
{k: v for k, v in mem.items() if k != "embedding"} for mem in retrieved_memories
]
return {
"question_index": orig_idx,
"question": question,
"correct_answer": correct_answer,
"predicted_answer": predicted_answer,
"reasoning": reasoning,
"category": category,
"retrieved_memories": memories_without_embeddings,
"is_invalid": False,
"error": None,
}
except Exception as e:
logging.exception(f"Failed to answer question: {question[:100]}")
# Mark as invalid if answer generation failed
console.print(
f" [red]✗[/red] Failed to answer question [{orig_idx}]: {question[:50]}... Error: {str(e)[:100]}"
)
return {
"question_index": orig_idx,
"question": question,
"correct_answer": correct_answer,
"predicted_answer": "ERROR: Failed to generate answer",
"reasoning": f"Error: {str(e)}",
"category": category,
"retrieved_memories": [],
"is_invalid": True,
"error": str(e),
}
question_tasks = [process_question(orig_idx, qa) for orig_idx, qa in indexed_pairs_to_eval]
# Use as_completed to update progress as results come in
results = []
for coro in asyncio.as_completed(question_tasks):
result = await coro
results.append(result)
progress.update(task, advance=1)
return results
async def calculate_metrics(self, results: List[Dict], eval_semaphore_size: int = 8) -> Dict:
"""
Calculate evaluation metrics using parallel LLM-as-judge.
Args:
results: QA results to evaluate
eval_semaphore_size: Max concurrent LLM judge requests
Returns:
Dict with evaluation metrics
"""
total = len(results)
# Semaphore to limit concurrent requests
semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(eval_semaphore_size)
with Progress(
SpinnerColumn(),
TextColumn("[progress.description]{task.description}"),
BarColumn(),
TextColumn("[progress.percentage]{task.percentage:>3.0f}%"),
console=console,
) as progress:
task = progress.add_task(
f"[yellow]Judging answers with LLM (parallel, max {eval_semaphore_size})...", total=total
)
# Create all judgment tasks
async def judge_single(result):
# Skip judging if already marked as invalid
if result.get("is_invalid", False):
result["is_correct"] = None
result["correctness_reasoning"] = (
f"Question invalid due to error: {result.get('error', 'Unknown error')}"
)
return result
try:
is_correct, eval_reasoning = await self.answer_evaluator.judge_answer(
result["question"],
result["correct_answer"],
result["predicted_answer"],
semaphore,
category=result.get("category"),
)
result["is_correct"] = is_correct
result["correctness_reasoning"] = eval_reasoning
return result
except Exception as e:
# Mark as invalid if judging failed
logging.exception(f"Failed to judge answer for question: {result.get('question', 'unknown')[:100]}")
console.print(
f" [red]✗[/red] Failed to judge answer: {result.get('question', '')[:50]}... Error: {str(e)[:100]}"
)
result["is_invalid"] = True
result["is_correct"] = None
result["correctness_reasoning"] = f"Judge error: {str(e)}"
result["error"] = str(e)
return result
judgment_tasks = [judge_single(result) for result in results]
# Process in parallel with progress updates
judged_results = []
for coro in asyncio.as_completed(judgment_tasks):
judged_result = await coro
judged_results.append(judged_result)
progress.update(task, advance=1)
# Calculate stats
correct = sum(1 for r in judged_results if r.get("is_correct", False))
invalid = sum(1 for r in judged_results if r.get("is_invalid", False))
valid_total = total - invalid
category_stats = {}
for result in judged_results:
category = result.get("category", "unknown")
if category not in category_stats:
category_stats[category] = {"correct": 0, "total": 0, "invalid": 0}
category_stats[category]["total"] += 1
if result.get("is_invalid", False):
category_stats[category]["invalid"] += 1
elif result.get("is_correct", False):
category_stats[category]["correct"] += 1
# Calculate accuracy excluding invalid questions
accuracy = (correct / valid_total * 100) if valid_total > 0 else 0
return {
"accuracy": accuracy,
"correct": correct,
"total": total,
"invalid": invalid,
"valid_total": valid_total,
"category_stats": category_stats,
"detailed_results": judged_results,
}
async def _agent_has_data(self, agent_id: str) -> bool:
"""
Check if an agent has any indexed memory units.
Args:
agent_id: Agent ID to check
Returns:
True if agent has at least one memory unit, False otherwise
"""
try:
# Use direct database access for local memory
pool = await self.memory._get_pool()
async with pool.acquire() as conn:
result = await conn.fetchrow(
"SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM memory_units WHERE bank_id = $1 LIMIT 1", agent_id
)
return result["count"] > 0
except Exception as e:
console.print(f" [red]Warning: Error checking agent data: {e}[/red]")
return False
async def process_single_item(
self,
item: Dict,
agent_id: str,
i: int,
total_items: int,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int],
skip_ingestion: bool,
question_semaphore: asyncio.Semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size: int = 8,
clear_this_agent: bool = True,
wait_consolidation: bool = False,
) -> Dict:
"""
Process a single item (ingest + evaluate).
Args:
clear_this_agent: Whether to clear this agent's data before ingesting.
Set to False to skip clearing (e.g., when agent_id is shared and already cleared)
wait_consolidation: If True, wait for consolidation to complete before evaluating QA.
Returns:
Result dict with metrics
"""
item_id = self.dataset.get_item_id(item)
console.print(f"\n[bold blue]Item {i}/{total_items}[/bold blue] (ID: {item_id})")
step = 1
if not skip_ingestion:
# Clear agent data before ingesting
if clear_this_agent:
console.print(f" [{step}] Clearing previous agent data...")
await self.memory.delete_bank(agent_id, request_context=RequestContext())
console.print(f" [green]✓[/green] Cleared '{agent_id}' agent data")
# Apply template if configured
if self.template_path:
step += 1
console.print(f" [{step}] Applying bank template...")
await self.apply_template(agent_id, self.template_path)
console.print(" [green]✓[/green] Template applied")
# Ingest conversation
step += 1
console.print(f" [{step}] Ingesting conversation (batch mode)...")
num_sessions = await self.ingest_conversation(item, agent_id, wait_for_consolidation=False)
console.print(f" [green]✓[/green] Ingested {num_sessions} sessions")
else:
num_sessions = -1
# Wait for consolidation before evaluating if requested
if wait_consolidation:
step += 1
console.print(f" [{step}] Waiting for consolidation...")
await self._wait_for_consolidation(agent_id)
# Evaluate QA
step += 1
qa_pairs = self.dataset.get_qa_pairs(item)
console.print(f" [{step}] Evaluating {len(qa_pairs)} QA pairs (parallel)...")
qa_results = await self.evaluate_qa_task(
agent_id,
qa_pairs,
item_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
max_questions_per_item,
question_semaphore,
)
# Calculate metrics
step += 1
console.print(f" [{step}] Calculating metrics...")
metrics = await self.calculate_metrics(qa_results, eval_semaphore_size)
console.print(
f" [green]✓[/green] Accuracy: {metrics['accuracy']:.2f}% ({metrics['correct']}/{metrics['total']})"
)
return {"item_id": item_id, "metrics": metrics, "num_sessions": num_sessions}
async def run(
self,
dataset_path: Path,
agent_id: str,
max_items: Optional[int] = None,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int] = None,
thinking_budget: int = 500,
max_tokens: int = 4096,
skip_ingestion: bool = False,
max_concurrent_questions: int = 1, # Default to 1 for sequential processing
eval_semaphore_size: int = 8,
clear_agent_per_item: bool = False,
specific_item: Optional[str] = None,
separate_ingestion_phase: bool = False,
filln: bool = False,
max_concurrent_items: int = 1, # Max concurrent items (conversations) to process in parallel
output_path: Optional[Path] = None, # Path to save results incrementally
merge_with_existing: bool = False, # Whether to merge with existing results
wait_consolidation: bool = False, # Wait for consolidation to complete before evaluating QA
template_path: Optional[str] = None, # Path to a bank template manifest to apply before ingestion
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Run the full benchmark evaluation.
Args:
dataset_path: Path to dataset file
agent_id: Agent ID to use
max_items: Maximum number of items to evaluate
max_questions_per_item: Maximum questions per item
thinking_budget: Thinking budget for search
max_tokens: Maximum tokens to retrieve from memories
skip_ingestion: Skip ingestion and use existing data
max_concurrent_questions: Max concurrent question processing
eval_semaphore_size: Max concurrent LLM judge requests
clear_agent_per_item: Use unique agent ID per item for isolation (deprecated when separate_ingestion_phase=True)
specific_item: If provided, only run this specific item ID (e.g., conversation)
separate_ingestion_phase: If True, ingest all data first, then evaluate all questions (single agent)
filln: If True, only process items where the agent has no indexed data yet
max_concurrent_items: Max concurrent items to process in parallel (requires clear_agent_per_item=True)
Returns:
Dict with complete benchmark results
"""
console.print("\n[bold cyan]Benchmark Evaluation[/bold cyan]")
console.print("=" * 80)
# Print model configuration
print_model_config()
# Load dataset
console.print(f"\n[1] Loading dataset from {dataset_path}...")
items = self.dataset.load(dataset_path, max_items)
# Filter for specific item if requested
if specific_item is not None:
items = [item for item in items if self.dataset.get_item_id(item) == specific_item]
if not items:
console.print(f" [red]✗[/red] No item found with ID: {specific_item}")
raise ValueError(f"Item with ID '{specific_item}' not found in dataset")
console.print(f" [green]✓[/green] Filtering to specific item: {specific_item}")
console.print(f" [green]✓[/green] Loaded {len(items)} items")
# Initialize memory system
console.print("\n[2] Initializing memory system...")
if template_path:
self.template_path = template_path
console.print(f" Bank template: {template_path}")
console.print(" [green]✓[/green] Memory system initialized")
if separate_ingestion_phase:
# New two-phase approach: ingest all, then evaluate all
return await self._run_two_phase(
items,
agent_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
skip_ingestion,
max_questions_per_item,
max_concurrent_questions,
eval_semaphore_size,
output_path,
merge_with_existing,
)
else:
# Original approach: process each item independently
return await self._run_single_phase(
items,
agent_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
skip_ingestion,
max_questions_per_item,
max_concurrent_questions,
eval_semaphore_size,
clear_agent_per_item,
filln,
max_concurrent_items,
output_path,
merge_with_existing,
wait_consolidation,
)
async def _run_single_phase(
self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
agent_id: str,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
skip_ingestion: bool,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int],
max_concurrent_questions: int,
eval_semaphore_size: int,
clear_agent_per_item: bool,
filln: bool = False,
max_concurrent_items: int = 1,
output_path: Optional[Path] = None,
merge_with_existing: bool = False,
wait_consolidation: bool = False,
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Original single-phase approach: process each item independently."""
# Create semaphore for question processing
question_semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent_questions)
# Process items - either in parallel or sequentially
if max_concurrent_items > 1 and clear_agent_per_item:
# Parallel item processing (requires unique agent IDs)
all_results = await self._process_items_parallel(
items,
agent_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
skip_ingestion,
max_questions_per_item,
question_semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size,
filln,
max_concurrent_items,
output_path,
merge_with_existing,
wait_consolidation,
)
else:
# Sequential item processing (original behavior)
all_results = await self._process_items_sequential(
items,
agent_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
skip_ingestion,
max_questions_per_item,
question_semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size,
clear_agent_per_item,
filln,
output_path,
merge_with_existing,
wait_consolidation,
)
# Calculate overall metrics
total_correct = sum(r["metrics"]["correct"] for r in all_results)
total_questions = sum(r["metrics"]["total"] for r in all_results)
total_invalid = sum(r["metrics"].get("invalid", 0) for r in all_results)
total_valid = total_questions - total_invalid
# Calculate accuracy excluding invalid questions
overall_accuracy = (total_correct / total_valid * 100) if total_valid > 0 else 0
return {
"overall_accuracy": overall_accuracy,
"total_correct": total_correct,
"total_questions": total_questions,
"total_invalid": total_invalid,
"total_valid": total_valid,
"num_items": len(items),
"model_config": get_model_config(),
"item_results": all_results,
}
async def _process_items_sequential(
self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
agent_id: str,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
skip_ingestion: bool,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int],
question_semaphore: asyncio.Semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size: int,
clear_agent_per_item: bool,
filln: bool,
output_path: Optional[Path] = None,
merge_with_existing: bool = False,
wait_consolidation: bool = False,
) -> List[Dict]:
"""Process items sequentially (original behavior)."""
all_results = []
existing_item_ids = set()
# Load existing results if merge_with_existing is True
if merge_with_existing and output_path and output_path.exists():
with open(output_path, "r") as f:
existing_data = json.load(f)
if "item_results" in existing_data:
all_results = existing_data["item_results"]
existing_item_ids = {r["item_id"] for r in all_results}
console.print(f"[cyan]Loaded {len(all_results)} existing results from {output_path}[/cyan]")
for i, item in enumerate(items, 1):
# Use unique agent ID per item if requested (for isolation in benchmarks like LongMemEval)
# This avoids deadlocks from deleting agent data
if clear_agent_per_item:
item_id = self.dataset.get_item_id(item)
item_agent_id = f"{agent_id}_{item_id}"
# Always clear for unique agents (each agent_id is used only once)
clear_this_agent = True
else:
item_agent_id = agent_id
# Only clear on first item for shared agent_id
clear_this_agent = i == 1
# Check if we should skip this item (fill mode - skip if already in results file)
item_id = self.dataset.get_item_id(item)
if filln:
if item_id in existing_item_ids:
console.print(f"\n[bold blue]Item {i}/{len(items)}[/bold blue] (ID: {item_id})")
console.print(" [yellow]⊘[/yellow] Skipping - already has results in output file")
continue
result = await self.process_single_item(
item,
item_agent_id,
i,
len(items),
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
max_questions_per_item,
skip_ingestion,
question_semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size,
clear_this_agent,
wait_consolidation,
)
# Replace existing result or append new one
result_item_id = result["item_id"]
if result_item_id in existing_item_ids:
# Replace existing result
all_results = [r for r in all_results if r["item_id"] != result_item_id]
console.print(f" [cyan]↻[/cyan] Updating existing result for {result_item_id}")
all_results.append(result)
existing_item_ids.add(result_item_id)
# Save results incrementally after each item
if output_path:
self._save_incremental_results(all_results, output_path)
return all_results
async def _process_items_parallel(
self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
agent_id: str,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
skip_ingestion: bool,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int],
question_semaphore: asyncio.Semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size: int,
filln: bool,
max_concurrent_items: int,
output_path: Optional[Path] = None,
merge_with_existing: bool = False,
wait_consolidation: bool = False,
) -> List[Dict]:
"""Process items in parallel (requires unique agent IDs per item)."""
# Load existing results if merge_with_existing is True
all_results = []
existing_item_ids = set()
result_lock = asyncio.Lock() # Lock for thread-safe updates to all_results
if merge_with_existing and output_path and output_path.exists():
with open(output_path, "r") as f:
existing_data = json.load(f)
if "item_results" in existing_data:
all_results = existing_data["item_results"]
existing_item_ids = {r["item_id"] for r in all_results}
console.print(f"[cyan]Loaded {len(all_results)} existing results from {output_path}[/cyan]")
# Create semaphore for item-level parallelism
item_semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent_items)
async def process_item_wrapper(i: int, item: Dict) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Wrapper to process a single item with semaphore control."""
async with item_semaphore:
item_id = self.dataset.get_item_id(item)
item_agent_id = f"{agent_id}_{item_id}"
# Check if we should skip this item (fill mode - skip if already in results file)
if filln:
if item_id in existing_item_ids:
console.print(f"\n[bold blue]Item {i}/{len(items)}[/bold blue] (ID: {item_id})")
console.print(" [yellow]⊘[/yellow] Skipping - already has results in output file")
return None
# Process the item
result = await self.process_single_item(
item,
item_agent_id,
i,
len(items),
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
max_questions_per_item,
skip_ingestion,
question_semaphore,
eval_semaphore_size,
clear_this_agent=True, # Always clear for parallel processing
wait_consolidation=wait_consolidation,
)
return result
# Create all tasks
tasks = [process_item_wrapper(i, item) for i, item in enumerate(items, 1)]
# Run in parallel and collect results incrementally
for completed_task in asyncio.as_completed(tasks):
result = await completed_task
if result is not None:
async with result_lock:
# Replace existing result or append new one
result_item_id = result["item_id"]
if result_item_id in existing_item_ids:
# Replace existing result
all_results = [r for r in all_results if r["item_id"] != result_item_id]
console.print(f" [cyan]↻[/cyan] Updating existing result for {result_item_id}")
all_results.append(result)
existing_item_ids.add(result_item_id)
# Save results incrementally after each item completes
if output_path:
self._save_incremental_results(all_results, output_path)
return all_results
async def _run_two_phase(
self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
agent_id: str,
thinking_budget: int,
max_tokens: int,
skip_ingestion: bool,
max_questions_per_item: Optional[int],
max_concurrent_questions: int,
eval_semaphore_size: int,
output_path: Optional[Path] = None,
merge_with_existing: bool = False,
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Two-phase approach: ingest all data into single agent, then evaluate all questions.
More realistic scenario where agent accumulates memories over time.
"""
# Phase 1: Ingestion
if not skip_ingestion:
# Calculate and display data statistics
console.print("\n[3] Analyzing data to be ingested...")
stats = self.calculate_data_stats(items)
console.print(f" [cyan]Total items:[/cyan] {stats['total_items']}")
console.print(f" [cyan]Total sessions:[/cyan] {stats['total_sessions']}")
console.print(f" [cyan]Total characters:[/cyan] {stats['total_chars']:,}")
console.print(f" [cyan]Avg session length:[/cyan] {stats['avg_session_length']:.0f} chars")
console.print(
f" [cyan]Session length range:[/cyan] {stats['min_session_length']}-{stats['max_session_length']} chars"
)
console.print(f"\n[4] Phase 1: Ingesting all data into agent '{agent_id}'...")
console.print(" [yellow]Clearing previous agent data...[/yellow]")
await self.memory.delete_bank(agent_id, request_context=RequestContext())
console.print(" [green]✓[/green] Cleared agent data")
# Apply template if configured
if self.template_path:
console.print(" [yellow]Applying bank template...[/yellow]")
await self.apply_template(agent_id, self.template_path)
console.print(" [green]✓[/green] Template applied")
# Collect all sessions and send in one batch (with auto-chunking)
console.print(" [yellow]Collecting sessions from all items...[/yellow]")
all_sessions = []
for item in items:
item_sessions = self.dataset.prepare_sessions_for_ingestion(item)
all_sessions.extend(item_sessions)
console.print(f" [cyan]Collected {len(all_sessions)} sessions from {len(items)} items[/cyan]")
console.print(" [yellow]Ingesting in one batch (auto-chunks if needed)...[/yellow]")
# Ingest all sessions in one batch call (will auto-chunk if too large)
await self.memory.retain_batch_async(
bank_id=agent_id, contents=all_sessions, request_context=RequestContext()
)
console.print(f" [green]✓[/green] Ingested {len(all_sessions)} sessions from {len(items)} items")
else:
console.print("\n[3] Skipping ingestion (using existing data)")
# Phase 2: Evaluation
console.print("\n[5] Phase 2: Evaluating all questions...")
# Create semaphore for question processing
question_semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent_questions)
all_results = []
for i, item in enumerate(items, 1):
item_id = self.dataset.get_item_id(item)
console.print(f"\n[bold blue]Item {i}/{len(items)}[/bold blue] (ID: {item_id})")
# Get QA pairs
qa_pairs = self.dataset.get_qa_pairs(item)
console.print(f" Evaluating {len(qa_pairs)} QA pairs (parallel)...")
qa_results = await self.evaluate_qa_task(
agent_id,
qa_pairs,
item_id,
thinking_budget,
max_tokens,
max_questions_per_item,
question_semaphore,
)
# Calculate metrics
metrics = await self.calculate_metrics(qa_results, eval_semaphore_size)
console.print(
f" [green]✓[/green] Accuracy: {metrics['accuracy']:.2f}% ({metrics['correct']}/{metrics['total']})"
)
all_results.append(
{
"item_id": item_id,
"metrics": metrics,
"num_sessions": -1, # Not tracked in two-phase mode
}
)
# Calculate overall metrics
total_correct = sum(r["metrics"]["correct"] for r in all_results)
total_questions = sum(r["metrics"]["total"] for r in all_results)
total_invalid = sum(r["metrics"].get("invalid", 0) for r in all_results)
total_valid = total_questions - total_invalid
overall_accuracy = (total_correct / total_valid * 100) if total_valid > 0 else 0
return {
"overall_accuracy": overall_accuracy,
"total_correct": total_correct,
"total_questions": total_questions,
"total_invalid": total_invalid,
"total_valid": total_valid,
"num_items": len(items),
"item_results": all_results,
}
def display_results(self, results: Dict[str, Any]):
"""Display benchmark results in a formatted table."""
console.print("\n[bold green]✓ Benchmark Complete![/bold green]\n")
# Display model configuration
if "model_config" in results:
config = results["model_config"]
console.print("[bold cyan]Model Configuration:[/bold cyan]")
console.print(f" Hindsight: {config['hindsight']['provider']}/{config['hindsight']['model']}")
console.print(
f" Answer Generation: {config['answer_generation']['provider']}/{config['answer_generation']['model']}"
)
console.print(f" LLM Judge: {config['judge']['provider']}/{config['judge']['model']}")
console.print()
# Display results table
table = Table(title="Benchmark Results", box=box.ROUNDED)
table.add_column("Item ID", style="cyan")
table.add_column("Sessions", justify="right", style="yellow")
table.add_column("Questions", justify="right", style="blue")
table.add_column("Correct", justify="right", style="green")
table.add_column("Invalid", justify="right", style="red")
table.add_column("Accuracy", justify="right", style="magenta")
for result in results["item_results"]:
metrics = result["metrics"]
invalid_count = metrics.get("invalid", 0)
invalid_str = str(invalid_count) if invalid_count > 0 else "-"
table.add_row(
result["item_id"],
str(result["num_sessions"]),
str(metrics["total"]),
str(metrics["correct"]),
invalid_str,
f"{metrics['accuracy']:.1f}%",
)
overall_invalid = results.get("total_invalid", 0)
invalid_str = str(overall_invalid) if overall_invalid > 0 else "-"
table.add_row(
"[bold]OVERALL[/bold]",
"-",
f"[bold]{results['total_questions']}[/bold]",
f"[bold]{results['total_correct']}[/bold]",
f"[bold]{invalid_str}[/bold]",
f"[bold]{results['overall_accuracy']:.1f}%[/bold]",
)
console.print(table)
# Display note about invalid questions if any
if overall_invalid > 0:
console.print(
f"\n[yellow]Note: {overall_invalid} question(s) marked as invalid due to errors (excluded from accuracy calculation)[/yellow]"
)
def merge_results(self, new_results: Dict[str, Any], existing_results: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Merge new results into existing results.
Updates or adds item results, then recalculates overall metrics.
Args:
new_results: New results to merge (typically from a specific item run)
existing_results: Existing results to merge into
Returns:
Merged results with updated overall metrics
"""
# Start with existing item results
merged_item_results = existing_results.get("item_results", [])
# Update or add new item results
for new_item in new_results["item_results"]:
item_id = new_item["item_id"]
# Find if item already exists
found = False
for i, existing_item in enumerate(merged_item_results):
if existing_item["item_id"] == item_id:
# Replace existing item result
merged_item_results[i] = new_item
found = True
console.print(f" [yellow]→[/yellow] Updated results for item: {item_id}")
break
if not found:
# Add new item result
merged_item_results.append(new_item)
console.print(f" [green]+[/green] Added results for item: {item_id}")
# Recalculate overall metrics from all item results
total_correct = sum(r["metrics"]["correct"] for r in merged_item_results)
total_questions = sum(r["metrics"]["total"] for r in merged_item_results)
total_invalid = sum(r["metrics"].get("invalid", 0) for r in merged_item_results)
total_valid = total_questions - total_invalid
# Calculate accuracy excluding invalid questions
overall_accuracy = (total_correct / total_valid * 100) if total_valid > 0 else 0
return {
"overall_accuracy": overall_accuracy,
"total_correct": total_correct,
"total_questions": total_questions,
"total_invalid": total_invalid,
"total_valid": total_valid,
"num_items": len(merged_item_results),
"item_results": merged_item_results,
}
def _save_incremental_results(self, all_results: List[Dict], output_path: Path):
"""
Save results incrementally to JSON file.
Args:
all_results: Current list of all item results
output_path: Path to save results to
"""
# Calculate metrics from current results
total_correct = sum(r["metrics"]["correct"] for r in all_results)
total_questions = sum(r["metrics"]["total"] for r in all_results)
total_invalid = sum(r["metrics"].get("invalid", 0) for r in all_results)
total_valid = total_questions - total_invalid
overall_accuracy = (total_correct / total_valid * 100) if total_valid > 0 else 0
results_dict = {
"overall_accuracy": overall_accuracy,
"total_correct": total_correct,
"total_questions": total_questions,
"total_invalid": total_invalid,
"total_valid": total_valid,
"num_items": len(all_results),
"model_config": get_model_config(),
"item_results": all_results,
}
with open(output_path, "w") as f:
json.dump(results_dict, f, indent=2, default=str)
def save_results(self, results: Dict[str, Any], output_path: Path, merge_with_existing: bool = False):
"""
Save results to JSON file.
Args:
results: Results to save
output_path: Path to save results to
merge_with_existing: If True, merge with existing results file if it exists
"""
if merge_with_existing and output_path.exists():
# Load existing results
with open(output_path, "r") as f:
existing_results = json.load(f)
console.print(f"\n[cyan]Merging with existing results from {output_path}...[/cyan]")
results = self.merge_results(results, existing_results)
with open(output_path, "w") as f:
json.dump(results, f, indent=2, default=str)
console.print(f"\n[green]✓[/green] Results saved to {output_path}")